Showing posts with label CHARLES B. PIERCE. Show all posts
Showing posts with label CHARLES B. PIERCE. Show all posts

Thursday, November 12, 2015

The Town That Dreaded Sundown (2014)


The Town That Dreaded Remakes (2014)
Dir. Alfonso Gomez-Rejon
Written by Roberto Aguirre-Sacasa
Starring  Addison Timlin Travis Tope, Spencer Treat Clark, Ed Lauter, Veronica Cartwright, Gary Cole, Anthony Anderson, Denis O’Hare



Some things just won’t stay dead. Disco. Hindus. Maxi-dresses. Star Trek. Anything laid to rest in an ancient Indian burial ground. The presidential aspirations of Rick Santorum. And of course, intellectual properties from the 70’s and 80’s with even a hint of name recognition among the lucrative 18-34 white urban male demographic. This last category has a particularly insidious method of reincarnation, and one with which you are no doubt already all too familiar. I speak, of course, of the dreaded postmodernist reimagining. First they came for NIGHTMARE ON ELM STREET, and I did not speak out because by that point, the franchise really needed to be put to bed anyway. Then they came for Fat Albert, and I did not speak out because really, who gives a fuck about that. Then they came for HELLRAISER, and I had to admit that they had discovered a legitimately novel way to humiliate that series further even than part VII had been able to. And now they’ve come for THE TOWN THAT DREADED SUNDOWN, and by this time there were no franchises left to speak up.


Yes, I’m tired of postmodernism too. In fact, I’m beyond tired. I mean, I’m fuckin’ done with it, man. Every time some big expensive movie comes out that spends most of Earth’s money on some half-imagined framework for self-referential bullshit hoping to leech off the real deal with some sycophantic in-jokes, I keep thinking “this is gonna be it, this is gonna be the one that sinks it.” I mean, how much further can the culture go up its own ass? Surely there’s some intrinsic physical limit, beyond which the accumulated mass of all the lazy metatextual clutter will just collapse in on a black hole of its own narcissism. Right? I mean, fuck, postmodernism is almost older than modernism by this point. Are we really going to accept a society which spends longer critiquing and deconstructing and self-indulgently commenting on art than actually making new art? Is this how civilization ends, when we forget how to actually create new ideas and just build an ever-more-cluttered perpetual motion machine of masturbatory pseudo-intellectual claptrap?

Remember that time this happened in that other movie? Pepperidge farm remembers.

Anyway, my point is that THE TOWN THAT DREADED SUNDOWN (2014) is actually pretty good. Not really because of its callow faux-critical meta-references, but definitely in spite of them. The meta-ness of it all doesn’t actually turn out to be all that important, because fundamentally this is just a nicely-made shiny modern slasher which just lifts a few too many specifics from another source to get away with just calling itself merely derivative. Openly acknowledging its daylight highway robbery of an older movie’s best moments and iconography is just a self-conscious coward’s way of following in the venerable horror movie tradition of ripping off other movies and simply adding your own twist, but I forgive it because its somewhat cumbersome desire for an overbuilt meta-narrative is actually pretty reflective of the movie as a whole. For better or worse, this is a agreeably ambitious film debut from venerable second-unit director Alfonso Gomez-Rejon (2nd-unit on BABEL, STATE OF PLAY and ARGO, director of many American Horror Story episodes) which is intent on throwing absolutely every trick in the book at you. One of those tricks happens to be postmodernism, but if that starts to annoy you, you’ve got every other trick in the book to entertain you in the meantime.


The movie announces its intentions with a long, show-offy TOUCH OF EVIL take, where the camera wanders inquisitively through a crowd of drive-in moviegoers who are watching the annual Halloween showing of Charles B. Pierce’s original 1976 THE TOWN THAT DREADED SUNDOWN, something of a tradition in the titular town itself. Texarkana (which straddles the border between Texas and Arkansas) has been free of Phantom menaces since 1946, and has happily contented itself with normal meth-fueled desperate redneck murders (at approximately 3 times the national average) which people seem to accept as normal and wholesome. They’ve made peace with their notorious past as both the site of the infamous Phantom Murders of the mid 40’s and their popular depiction in the beloved proto-slasher film from ‘76. But someone out there isn’t happy with this state of equilibrium, and sets out to re-create the Texarkana Moonlight Murders with a few modern twists. The first target is perky young high school senior Jami (Addison Timlin, ODD THOMAS, but most noted as the recipient of the prestigious national award for “most millennial name that modern science has yet been able to devise”) and her handsome jock boyfriend Corey (Spencer Treat Clark, veteran of the LAST HOUSE ON THE LEFT REMAKE). They’ve left the movie early and headed out in their car to makeout point, which is a normal thing that modern couples would do, when suddenly -- what the fuck, this can’t be happening -- it’s the Phantom! The burlap-masked maniac murders (and rapes?) Corey, but lets Jami go with a message: "This is for Mary. Make them remember."

Speaking of making them remember, remember the last time you saw this logo? It was 1999. THE TOWN THAT DREADED REMAKES is actually their flagship re-launch film.

Jami makes it back home alive to her grandmother (Veronica Cartwright, ALIEN, CANDYMAN 2), but can’t let things go. Before long, she and a suspiciously helpful stranger (Travis Tope, the upcoming INDEPENDENCE DAY SEQUEL!!) are investigating the resurgent crime wave along with the help of local police played by Joshua Leonard (THE BLAIR WITCH PROJECT), Ed Lauter (MAGIC, THE LOST, THE ARTIST in his penultimate film) and Gary Cole (TO LIVE AND DIE IN LA [“man chased by Richard Chance," uncredited], OFFICE SPACE) and a visiting Texas Ranger played by Anthony Anderson (THE DEPARTED, KANGAROO JACK). That’s right, this cast has Veronica Cartwright, Ed Lauter, Joshua Leonard, Gary Cole, and Anthony Anderson, and I haven’t even mentioned yet that venerable character actors Edward Herrmann (NIXON, THE CAT’S MEOW, THE PAPER CHASE) and Denis O’Hare (MILK, EDGE OF DARKNESS, CHANGELING) appear as possible suspects. Holy shit, that’s a dream cast of distinguished b-movie players. Basically every adult role in this movie is played by a profoundly overqualified character actor. Almost none of the roles here require any particular acting prowess, but someone was smart enough to get that cast anyway. That’s hustle, right there.


Anyway, while most of the cast sits around without much to do (Anderson’s sheriff character actually takes some time to watch an old VHS copy of the original TOWN THAT DREADED SUNDOWN!), Jami starts to put together a list of suspects, all of whom relate in some way either to the original murders, or the original movie. Meanwhile, the phantom killer continues to strike in a series of splendidly orchestrated kill scenes, many of which are elegant riffs on scenes from said movie. So we’ve got a fictional meta movie, set in the “real” world, which acknowledges the existence of the original fictionalized movie and also the original real-world murders which were fictionalized by both movies. That’s some ripe, rich, overthinking, there. It’s playful in a kind of predictable way for this kind of thing, but there is a certain cheerful cleverness there, which is helped by a pretty light touch which doesn’t underscore how ridiculous all this is. You’re allowed to have fun with the concept, but the movie itself is taking it pretty seriously, for the most part. Even when the murder mystery’s twists and turns brings them to the point of interviewing the fictional son of real director Pierce (O’Hare) for information about a fictional suspect for the real murders, the movie plays it straight, as if this was a normal exposition scene that would happen in a slasher like this.




Hence, the emphasis is really on the slasher part of its meta-slasher pedigree. And that actually ends up being fine, because it’s a much better actual slasher than it is a postmodernist deconstruction. In fact, I’d go so far as to say it’s actually one of the best-made slashers I’ve seen in a good while. The movie never quite matches the technical hustle of its assured opening shot, but it’s nonetheless quite an impressive production all the way through, from its handsome cinematography by Michael Goi (prolific Z-movie and TV DP, including 40 credited turns on American Horror Story) to its smartly-constructed kill scenes, to it’s sharp editing and moody score. Gomez-Rejon and co. just seem to get the internal mechanics of slashers in a way which is surprisingly rare in modern times. It’s not just that the film has an elegant, almost Spielbergian sense of cinematic grammar, it’s that this is a rare modern slasher that understands the thrill is in the chase, not just the kill.


I love a gory death scene as much as anyone, but the slasher genre slowly ate itself alive during the 80’s as one-upmanship on imaginative gimmicks replaced actual suspense as the raison d'etre for the genre. With those gimmicks came a focus on the money shot, with all that entails -- but in doing so, the art of building up to those moments got shuffled to the background. And of course, that’s where the actual terror lies; once the stabbing starts, there’s no conflict anymore, you’re simply left with grim spectacle. But the chase -- the chase has the ability to actually get your heart pumping. Gomez-Rejon seems determined to reclaim that nightmarish sense of pursuit. The movie excels at crafting top-notch stalking and fleeing sequences in various colorful milieus, from a moonlit cornfield which turns into a disorienting maze, to a junkyard of iconic 50’s detritus, the latter of which also conveys a subtle meta-joke about the recycled plotline.




Gomez-Rejon even goes out of his way to concoct endearing victims --the exact opposite route most slashers take, but crucial to cultivating actual suspense. Even totally disposable characters who materialize just in time for their demise (for example, the young couple who are murdered moments after fucking each others’ brains out at a local motel) are given a few moments to humanize their characters beyond the stereotypical meat wagon conceit. It doesn’t take much; not even any dialogue, sometimes. Just a moment or two of earnest human vulnerability, and suddenly we’re rooting for them to get away, rather than waiting like disinterested scavengers to see the lurid details or their demise. I mean, it’s not exactly high praise to say that a horror movie actually comprehends the basic mechanics of suspense, but these days it seems like a  mildly revolutionary concept in this genre, especially for an explicitly postmodern attempt.


Its strong focus on classically structured stalking and slashing sequences manages to keep everything pretty grounded and earnest, despite the trapping that make it seem suspiciously like an attempt at a millennial answer to SCREAM.* Or at least, it does riiiiiight up to the end when it kinda maybe ruins things with a ridiculous reveal of the killer that might as well have come from a SCREAM sequel. The original TOWN THAT DREADED SUNSHINE, for all its eccentric missteps, knew that the whole reason anyone even cared about any of this is that a mystery killer is always more interesting than some prattling red herring who wants to tell you his life story. The remake can’t resist trying to come up with some outlandish twist to justify the whodunit angle it drapes the lank vestiges of a plot upon, and hence suffers in comparison. I’ll warrant the explanation is respectably outlandish, but while it might succeed in surprising you, it’s way too silly to really stick with you or offer a satisfying conclusion to what up until this point has been a pretty sincere effort.**


Even so, on average this one is still way ahead of the competition. I’ll forgive its transgressions as unavoidable overreach resulting from an excess of ambition, which isn’t always a bad thing. I’m not really convinced that the meta elements add anything meaningful or have anything especially interesting to say about the medium or our strange collective obsession with dramatizing real-life murders in a schlocky genre format. Maybe there’s a meta-horror remake which could be made that explores that stuff, but this ain’t it. No problem, though, because at least it adds a mildly amusing little wrinkle to what is otherwise an assured and highly successful reminder that modern slashers needn’t be either grueling downers or smarmy pastiches. And that’s my final word on the subject. At least, ‘til I come back and do another version of this review years later, which obsessively references the original review without really commenting on it in any kind of meaningful way. Look, postmodernism may be the last refuge of the scoundrel, but someday I’m gonna be out of ideas, too.


*Interestingly enough, the remake also appears to take place in a world where THE TOWN THAT DREADED SUNDOWN (1976) is the only slasher movie ever made -- otherwise they’d have no choice but to admit the ending is (spoiler) cribbed straight from SCREAM. All the characters are super aware of the 1976 movie, but seem to have a total ignorance about any other slasher movie, and the very existence of the slasher genre in general.

**Still, the focus on the killer’s identity does result in one charming quirk. From his first appearance, we can see that the “Phantom” is a white male with striking blue eyes. You’d think that would be a useful clue until you gradually realize that  every single possible suspect character ALSO has blue eyes. Man, is this town filled with Swedes or what?



The Town That Dreaded Sundown, film

CHAINSAWNUKAH 2015 CHECKLIST!

Play it Again, Samhain

  • TAGLINE: From the producers of PARANORMAL ACTIVITY and INSIDIOUS and the co-creator of AMERICAN HORROR STORY. Not too catchy as taglines go.
  • LITERARY ADAPTATION: No
  • SEQUEL: No
  • REMAKE: Yes, though with that meta element
  • DEADLY IMPORT FROM: USA
  • FOUND-FOOTAGE CLUSTERFUCK: No
  • SLUMMING A-LISTER: Maybe Anthony Anderson? He was in THE DEPARTED, after all.
  • BELOVED HORROR ICON: Veronica Cartwright for sure. Ed Lauter's been in MAGIC, CUJO, THE LOST, and GLEAMING THE CUBE which I'm going to assume without looking is a CUBE sequel. I don't know if that's enough to count as a horror icon, but shit, we all love him, let's just agree that he's earned it. Danielle Harris supposedly cameo's as "Townperson #2" although I didn't notice her.
  • BOOBIES: Yep
  • MULLETS: None
  • SEXUAL ASSAULT: The killer makes his first victim take his pants off and it seems kinda like something sexual is happening there, although the twist makes that seem unlikely.
  • DISMEMBERMENT PLAN: Head cut off and thrown through window, cool!
  • HAUNTED HOUSE: No
  • MONSTER: No
  • THE UNDEAD: No
  • POSSESSION: No.
  • SLASHER/GIALLO: Yes.
  • PSYCHO KILLERS (Non-slasher variety): No
  • EVIL CULT: No.
  • (UNCANNY) VALLEY OF THE DOLLS: None
  • EGYPTO-CRYPTO: No!
  • TRANSMOGRIFICATION: None
  • VOYEURISM: Yeah, the killer does a little watching, though he pounces pretty quick.
  • OBSCURITY LEVEL: Mid, had a fairly large rollout for a DTV horror movie last year.
  • MORAL OF THE STORY: The killer should definitely have said "Postmodern? Try Postmortem!!" at some point.
  • TITLE ACCURACY: Yes, both fairly accurate to the story and a good reference to the beloved original.
  • ALEX MADE IT THROUGH AWAKE: N/A.

Timilin and Cartwright discuss her college plans. It's a little iffy because they kind of acknowledge the (spoiler, male) killer, but I think we can let it slide.

Wednesday, February 4, 2015

The Town that Dreaded Sundown (1976)


The Town that Dreaded Sundown (1976)
Dir. Charles B. Pierce
Written by Earl E. Smith
Starring Ben Johnson, Andrew Prine, Dawn Wells, Charles B. Pierce




No getting around it, THE TOWN THAT DREADED SUNDOWN (1976) is a strange film. It’s part true-crime docu-drama (complete with grim-voiced narration), part legit white-knuckle slasher, part goofy comedy, part affectionate travelogue of its Texarkana* locale. It’s an odd beast, but it’s exactly what you’d want from director Charles B. Pierce, who spent the 70’s as an indie genre auteur long before that kind of thing had a name --let alone a business plan-- grinding out southern-fried ultra-low-budget DIY films which seamlessly blend charming amateurishness with some indisputable genre thrills, and many of which managed to actually end up a bit ahead of their time. He’s most known for his first film, the 1972 bigfootsploitation fauxumentary THE LEGEND OF BOGGY CREEK, but by TOWN THAT DREADED SUNDOWN he was already four years and four movies into his directorial career, and still finding time to work as a set dresser for stuff like COFFY and BLACK BELT JONES in his downtime. Does this guy need a congressional medal of valor or what?


TTtDS mimics the format of BOGGY CREEK, with its quasi-documentary structure complete with narration and references to specific dates and crimes (apparently with near-zero accuracy), but is also slightly more assured and intermittently competent. It’s certainly a strange film, but it wouldn’t, for example, pause for minutes on end while an off-screen voice sings a laid-back folk song, like BOGGY CREEK does. It’s a little more normal than that. Basically, it’s a ZODIAC (2007)-style chronicle of a series of slayings which occurred in and around Texarkana in 1946 (colorfully dubbed “the Texarkana Moonlight murders”), with a plot loosely tied together by the efforts of the law enforcement officers trying (and failing**) to crack the case. It doesn’t exactly have a traditional narrative, it’s more like a series of vignettes related to the case, though gradually some story shape takes form around the out-of-towner police captain J.D. Morales (Ben Johnson) loosely based on the real-life M. T. “Lone Wolf” Gonzuallas.





Let’s pause and take a second to consider just how god damn great Ben Johnson is. Here’s this guy, the son of a rancher, who arrived in Hollywood because he was delivering a carload of horses to Howard Hughes for THE OUTLAW (1943). While in the area, he took a few stunt jobs here and there in between horse gigs before heroically saving three men in a runaway wagon during a unexpected horse stampede on the set of John Ford’s 1948 FORT APACHE. Ford said he wanted to reward Johnson for his actions, which Johnson thought might mean another job as a riding double or an extra -- instead, he gave him a seven-year acting contract (Johnson signed it immediately after reading up to line 5, where the words “$5,000 a week” appeared). He went on to appear in a ton of classics, including SHE WORE A YELLOW RIBBON, RIO GRANDE, SHANE, HANG ‘EM HIGH, THE WILD BUNCH, and THE GETAWAY, and even won a god damn Academy Award for THE LAST PICTURE SHOW. Did he let success change him? Fuck no, he stuck to what he knew, kept himself humble, and was apparently not above appearing in zero-budget way-outside-hollywood THE TOWN THAT DREADED SUNDOWN a few short years after his Oscar win. But it’s not just that he had an interesting and successful film career that makes him great; it’s that he brought such a strong sense of authenticity to his roles. I mean, this is not some John Wayne frat boy phony cowboy movie star; this is the guy they brought in because he actually knew how to do real-life badass things, not just pretend to do them in the movies. He lived a real life, had real experiences, instead of just acting like he could. And you can see it on his face every minute he’s on the screen; there’s a calm confidence and (dare I say?) true grit that just radiates from those sharp eyes. Here, he doesn’t always give the most convincing line readings in the world (not that the lines themselves are exactly convincing), but he is absolutely convincingly grizzled, and that matters a whole lot more. Words are important, but you can’t fake this kind of gravitas. They don’t really make ‘em like that anymore, so every movie you get to see with Johnson in it feels like a nostalgic look into a bygone era.





Speaking of bygone eras, one reason Johnson fits right in here is because the movie has a surprisingly strong sense of time and place. It’s possible that by 1976 Arkansas still looked pretty much the same as it did in 1946, but whatever the reason, even with its strange structure and low budget the movie has an authentic feel of the 40’s, which makes it pretty unusual for a slasher pic. Is there any other slasher movie set so far back in history? I guess the millions of Jack the Ripper movies, but those are almost a genre unto themselves. Seems like Slashers are almost exclusively a modern phenomenon, so setting one in this era has a distinctly different feel to it. The cops don’t really know what to do, they don’t know how to act when there’s something crazy like this.


The movie doesn’t exactly know how to act either, because it preceded the Modern American Slasher Period a bit. I mean, there had been a few stabs (heh) in that direction -- SILENT NIGHT, BLOODY NIGHT in 1973, BLACK CHRISTMAS in 1974, and of course PSYCHO and a bunch of giallos before that-- but HALLOWEEN, the one which really started the American Slasher wave and established its rules, was still two years off. Left without much to model itself on, TOWN THAT DREADED SUNDOWN finds itself without the usual rules and tropes, exploring new territory. Pierce seems to have a natural feel for the kill scenes, which are startlingly effective and seedy, complete with invented gimmick kills (one particularly inspired touch finds the killer murdering a band student by strapping a knife to her trombone and using its slide to stab her) and lurid (though not explicit) sexual suggestion. He struggles with the plot a little, however, mistakenly focusing on the police investigation, which is by definition in this genre going to be ineffective and the least satisfying story thread. Later slashers would mostly dump the law enforcement angle in favor of the “final girl” model, which suits the material a lot better. Fortunately you got Johnson in there, and he’s nicely assisted by Andrew Prine (THE LORDS OF SALEM) as a competent but overwhelmed local cop and Pierce himself as a (for my money) pretty funny deputy named “Sparkplug.” So even if they don’t have the best story, they’re enjoyable to watch. Oh, and Dawn Wells (“Mary Ann” from Gilligan’s Island), is one of the victims, so if you ever wanted to see her terrorized by a sadistic masked killer, I bet this is your only chance. Although to be fair I haven’t seen every episode of Gilligan’s Island, maybe one of those has a masked killer too.




The sequences with the killer are really intense, particularly since whoever’s behind that mask has a frightening physicality; he’s not a supernatural boogyman, and his victims aren’t always totally helpless, leading the murders to be prolonged, messy affairs highlighted by the hooded phantom’s perverse heavy breathing under his burlap mask. It’s a real person under there, not some mythological figure -- but who he is and what he thinks he’s doing, we’ll never know, making him all the more frightening. There's such a bizarre, incomprehensible sadism to this guy that it's hard not to feel genuinely unnerved. These scenes sit a bit uneasily with the other subplots, of course. A lot of reviewers have complained about the occasional goofy humor and inconsistent tone, and technically, they have a point. But I don’t know, for me it kind of adds both to the charm and to the horror. It’s charming because it highlights the homemade, DIY vibe here; even in 1976, no studio would ever let you get away with something like that, but Pierce thought it would be a good idea and he went with it. It helps with the horror too, though, by juxtaposing such repugnant brutality with wacky hijinks and broad mugging, resulting in something kind of grotesque and shocking, like if an episode of TAXI had a series of tangentially related scenes with the Son of Sam brutally murdering people, peppered throughout a normal sitcom plot. It’s an extremely odd balance, though, and I don’t blame some people for thinking that the movie would be better if it was as consistently serious and unnerving as the scenes with the killer manage to be. Fortunately by the movie’s climactic scene, the various plots and tones somehow manage to kind of, if not exactly meld, at least braid together for a seriously exciting chase scene between the cops and the killer. The final, ambiguous ending is perfect, though the “Captain Morales went on to…” intertitle text that follows it is perhaps unnecessary, since, uh, none of these characters are actually real people.


TTtDS is mostly remembered today for what it predicted: the iconic image of the bag-headed serial killer which would return in FRIDAY THE 13th PART II, the gimmicky killer, the rise of the true-life-serial-killer fad which is still going strong today, the idea of epilogue text describing what happened to fictional characters in a movie based on a true story (which Michael Bay revived for his nightmarish but semi-watchable PAIN AND GAIN), the cottage industry of non-Hollywood local indie film artisans that it inspired. But the charm to me is what it is: a true American original by a guy who decided to just up and try and make movies his own way, on his own terms. Pierce would make a few more movies (including the excellent and underseen THE EVICTORS with Michael Parks) but never quite broke into the mainstream again. His legacy, though, is a whole generation of young indie auteurs for whom he blazed a trail, who are even now making their own ill-advised, ungainly, amateurish, but authentically personal films about serial killers and bigfoots and whatnot. In fact, this very year a kind of meta-sequel remake of TOWN THAT DREADED SUNDOWN was produced, with actor Denis O’Hare (21 GRAMS, MILK, DALLAS BUYER’S CLUB) portraying Pierce himself.*** Evidence enough of the enduring legend of one of indie cinema’s great originals.


*Man, that CCR song about the cotton fields really left out the whole part about the psycho slasher with a trombone fetish. Maybe the song was running long or something?

**Not a spoiler, the poster informs us that the killer “still lurks the streets of Texarkana, Ark,” apparently to the consternation of the local government there, who asked Pierce to remove the tagline.


***Edit: actually he's playing Pierce's fictional son, although another actor does portray Pierce himself in a brief flashback.



CHAINSAWNUKAH 2014 CHECKLIST!

The Hunt For Dread October

  • LITERARY ADAPTATION: No, (loosely) based on a true story
  • SEQUEL: Yes, one of those weird meta-sequel/ remakes came out this very year
  • REMAKE: Apparently the sequel is also kind of a remake
  • FOREIGNER: Nope, home-grown American
  • FOUND-FOOTAGE CLUSTERFUCK: No, even though it's using a documentary format it doesn't attempt anything like that.
  • SLUMMING A-LISTER: Academy-award winner Ben Johnson
  • BELOVED HORROR ICON: Uh... Andrew Prine was in LORDS OF SALEM?
  • BOOBIES: None
  • SEXUAL ASSAULT: No
  • DISMEMBERMENT PLAN: None, just stabbing
  • HAUNTED HOUSE: No
  • MONSTER: No
  • THE UNDEAD: No
  • POSSESSION: No
  • SLASHER/GIALLO: Prototypical slasher. The format doesn't quite fit, but there's no mistaking it.
  • PSYCHO KILLERS (Non-slasher variety): No
  • EVIL CULT: No
  • (UNCANNY) VALLEY OF THE DOLLS: None
  • TRANSMOGRIFICATION: No
  • OBSCURITY LEVEL: Fairly high, out of print until recently.
  • MORAL OF THE STORY: Play the harp or something instead, a trombone is just asking for a serial killer to use it to ironically murder you.
  • TITLE ACCURACY: Accurate! The murders were committed at night.
  • ALEX MADE IT THROUGH AWAKE: N/A
I enjoyed it, your mileage may vary depending upon how much you can stand weird comedy juxtaposed with brutal violence. Basically, the TUSK ratio test. 

Tuesday, November 13, 2012

The Evictors

The Evictors (1979)
Dir. Charles B. Pierce
Written by Charles B. Pierce, Garry Rusoff, Paul Fisk
Starring Michael Parks, Jessica Harper, Vic Morrow

Love the poster, although of course this doesn't actually happen. Poster guys back then really thought we'd get off on seeing creepy guys carrying women off, I guess just like now when they assume we'll go for any old cover showing a woman being unwillingly dragged off camera. What, are guys just more in the mood for a challenge more these days? I guess maybe that's a victory for feminism?

    Somewhere around the turn of the century in rural Louisiana, three unbalanced residents of a modest farmhouse are being evicted by the local cops. They refuse to go quietly, and instigate a typhoon of gunfire that riddles the house and the cops. Now, in 1940, a nice young couple has moved into the long-vacant former abode of the anti-evictors, only to find ominous signs that they, too, are not wanted here.

    It’s a classic rural siege movie in most ways, playing expertly on that fear that takes you in the middle of the night that maybe someone is in your house, and gradually building that creepy paranoia into a full-on panic. There are lots of elements here which play on your fears: the remote, vulnerable location, away from anyone who might help. The incoming residents, outsiders in a local community which seems to have dangerous secrets that they aren’t in on. The attractive, educated city folk feeling judged and ostracized by the country bumpkins who don’t think much of their high-falutin’ ways. The uncomfortable inner conflict of wondering if your fears are justified or just a product of your own anxiety.

    These are the ingredients to many horror movies, and particularly this kind of rural siege tale, wherein our protagonists are isolated and threatened by unknown, aggressive, unreasonable forces (for instance, CAPE FEAR, THE HILLS HAVE EYES, THE MIST, NIGHT OF THE LIVING DEAD, even non-horror stuff like STRAW DOGS or FORT APACHE). But the difference here is that director Charles B. Pierce is focusing on the aspects most often forgotten by horror directors: acting, atmosphere, motivation, time and place. The little things that happen in-between the big scare scenes. THE EVICTORS is rated PG (obviously it would be PG-13 now) and is small-scale and almost tame by the standards of something like THE HILLS HAVE EYES, but packs a punch because what it lacks in elaborate setpieces and crowdpleasing monsters it makes up for by making you care enough that the small stuff matters more.



For fucks sake, we just let you out, and now you want to come back in?!

    I mean, aren’t you supposed to cast James Marsden and Julia Stiles as your besieged couple? You know, attractive, bland white people in their early 30s who make a living being professionally victimized and looking attractive and unmemorable? Their job is to be white and sympathetic, it’s the killer that’s gotta be interesting. That’s where you’re gonna get your Klaus Kinski or Michael Ironside, maybe even a slumming De Niro or Jeremy Irons. But EVICTORS has it all backwards. We hardly get to see the killer, but the couple in question is (are?) Michael Parks and Jessica Harper, both easily interesting enough to qualify for a role as a teen-slashing psychopath, but here playing very sympathetic and relatable characters.

    They’re a young couple, but they’re not kids and they’re not disposable victims. Instead, they’re a believable and endearing couple of adults trying to make the best of a somewhat tense situation (the subtext is that husband Ben needs this job fixing cotton gins in order to avoid being drafted). Ruth (Harper) --home by herself all day and trying to stay positive about it-- is obviously the first to notice something is strange. But when Ben tries to console her by telling her that the creepy guy trying to get through the back door was probably just a drifter who didn’t know that the long-abandoned house was now occupied, he doesn’t sound like the typically obtuse horror movie boyfriend; he sounds like a guy who’s trying both to console and convince himself that everything is going to be OK because he’s up against a wall and trying to make things work. I think we’ve all been in the position of trying to comfort someone when a small part of us is pretty sure it’s actually not OK. But there’s nothing to do but hope.


Happiness is a warm gun and being married to Michael Parks. Also being in SUSPIRA.

Parks, of course, if forever a hero of American cinema for his unbelievably good turn in RED STATE, but he’s done a million things (Twin Peaks, KILL BILL, THE ASSASSINATION OF JESSE JAMES BY THE COWARD ROBERT FORD, ARGO, DEATH WISH V, THE BIBLE: IN THE BEGINNING [where he played Adam at what I must assume was literally the beginning], and heck, he even played Josey Wales in the much-derided sequel THE RETURN OF JOSEY WALES). So we knew he was gonna be great, but I’d forgotten about Jessica Harper, (SUSPIRIA, STARDUST MEMORIES, LOVE & DEATH, THE PHANTOM OF PARADISE, MINORITY REPORT) who may give the very best performance in a role like this that I’ve ever seen. She’s fine with the terrorized stuff, but also unexpectedly great at everything in-between, finding a way to still seem sane, rational, and capable even as she has to stay alone in a house under assault by unknown forces. The direction keeps things getting ever-tenser without ever lapsing into complete historics, so it’s key that both the protagonists and the world feel equally believable.

    Director Pierce (primarily a set decorator for films like COFFY, THE PHANTOM TOLLBOOTH and whaddaya know, THE OUTLAW JOSEY WALES) was something of a indie horror auteur, setting out on his own to make the ground-breaking (and still endearing, if also dated and silly) LEGEND OF BOGGY CREEK and the early serial-killer classic THE TOWN THAT DREADED SUNDOWN. Piece, a native of Arkansas since childhood, has a keen eye and ear for portraying his Southern locations in all their Southern Gothic glory. It’s funny, because it’s not exactly a realistic portrayal; just a better evocation of of that dreamy eerieness you want out of spanish moss and long country roads than most of those Hollywood goofballs can manage. A couple cast members even have genuine southern accents, how bout that? But even though Pierce is himself a Southerner, he still knows that our heroes are city folk, and hence any one of these shifty corn-fed confederates is suspect. Should we be worried about the traveling tinkerman, whose Louisiana accent is so authentic I can barely understand him? What about the too-friendly crippled old lady next door? And what about Ben’s Colonel Sanders-costumed boss? And what about their shifty real estate agent? Should we be worried about him just because he’s played by Vic Morrow (who gets top billing even though he’s hardly in it) and seems both sleazy and like he’s always on the verge of telling them something important?

    I suppose THE EVICTORS is too small-scale and tame to really resonate with most genre fans, but as far as I’m concerned this is one of the best stalker/slasher films I’ve watched in a long time. There’s a richness to the setting and relationships which lends unexpected beauty and weight, and even when it strains credulity it can back it up by playing surprisingly rough, even going for a genuinely blood-chilling grim ending. In most horror movies, you want a bleak ending to reinforce the horror that came before and make sure that audiences leave unsettled and disturbed (or, in the case of SINISTER, to make sure that they leave having had a juggalo unexpectedly yell at them one last time). Usually I’m all about that, but here you like the protagonists so much that the ending is actually kind of a downer, legitimately downbeat even as it works as a good horror twist. Pierce, who clearly has a lot of affection for his characters, even expressed regret at going for such an unforgiving finale. It pays off, though, as one of the most surprising and affecting parting shots I’ve seen in a horror movie in quite awhile. Lots of movies can say they scared or disturbed you. How many can genuinely say they made you sad? Pierce would go on to do a few more films (and even write the story for SUDDEN IMPACT) but to me this stands as his best work, a dreamy and melancholy evocation of the South as a impenetrable riddle where the violent past can unexpectedly lash out at the mundane present. 


CHAINSAWNUKAH 2012 CHECKLIST!

LOVECRAFT ADAPTATION: No, "based on true events"
BOOBIES: None.
> or = HERSCHELL GORDON LEWIS LEVEL GORE: A little blood, not really gore.
SEQUEL: the Bobby-McFerrin-starring sequel "THE MAY HAVE TO LITIGATORS" was a little tamer.
OBSCURITY LEVEL: Extremely high. Little-seen, out-of-print for years, somehow skipped DVD and went straight to Netflix streaming.
MONSTERS: No.
SATANISTS: No.
ZOMBIES: No.
VAMPIRES: No.
SLASHERS: Much of the slashing was done before the events of this film, but definitely a serial killer/stalker/stabber, so I'll say yes.
CURSES: None explicit.
ALEX MADE IT THROUGH AWAKE: N/A.
Ruth and her creepy neighbor talk about the house's violent past.