Showing posts with label PIRANHA ASSISTED COMEUPPANCE. Show all posts
Showing posts with label PIRANHA ASSISTED COMEUPPANCE. Show all posts

Tuesday, October 2, 2012

Piranha 3DD

Piranha 3DD (2012)
Dir. John Gulager
Written by Patrick Melton, Marcus Dunstan, Joel Soisson
Starring no one, but with cameos by Christopher Lloyd, Gary Busey, Clu Gulager, David Koechner, Ving Rhames, Paul Scheer, and David Hasselhoff.




I actually sort of loved Alexandre Aja’s 2010 3D schlockfest PIRANHA 3D, which surprised me by striking the exact perfect campy-but-deadpan tone necessary for this sort of genre gorefest. After the fairly grim HAUTE TENSION and profoundly grim THE HILLS HAVE REMAKES, I could hardly believe that this arty Frenchman so perfectly understood the brisk, outrageously bloody vibe that something like a PIRANHA sequel lives and dies on. The pace was a little off, and some of its premises were underexploited, but I couldn’t fault it’s frequent gimmicky deaths and winning cartoonishness. Still, I can’t say I saw much of a point in revisiting the same material again, except smaller, cheaper, and straight-to-DVD. If you’re gonna do a cheapie cash grab sequel to a movie which was at best a mild pleasure, you’re gonna need a way better hook than “Piranhas eat people in a swimming pool.” SyFy raised the bar on that kind of crap when they started inventing their own animals, such as SHARKTOPUS and DINOGATOR and possibly SKUNKTOSAUR vs GORILLAPHANT if not yet than in the very near future.

But, for the smaller, cheaper, more unnecessary sequel, this one ain’t all that bad. It has a few pretty clever gimmicks, including but not limited to an exploding cow, a vagina piranha, a decapitation that comes to rest amidst a bountiful pair of the title characters (not the piranhas), a pitchfork impalement, an ass piranha, and Gary Busey biting off a piranha’s head and spitting it at the camera in 3-D. None of that tastelessness was strictly necessary for them to make the same negligible amount of money they were going to make on it anyway, so fair’s fair, nice work guys. You also get some credit for, in true B-movie fashion, getting all those cameos for one day of shooting apiece (Clu Gulager is director John’s dad I guess, so maybe he was easier to rope into this sort of nonsense).



Two things, though, make this sequel obviously inferior to the original remake.* For one, it can’t match the spectacle of the original remake bloodbath, which they make the mistake of actually showing us here to remind us how wimpy their climax looks by comparison. Piranhas in a water park is a fun idea, but in practice it becomes obvious that there’s nowhere in the entire park where you’re more than 3 feet from the sides, so they quickly run out of excuses for people to be eaten. Most of the funnier deaths are near the start or middle of the movie, and the climax doesn’t have nearly enough heft to compensate (in fact, the two most memorable deaths of the final bloodbath are not piranha-related at all). It doesn’t help that they also maintain the previous film’s stupid idea of making the main characters the least fun people anywhere on screen. We’re supposed to be rooting for the two characters who are constantly whining to everyone else that they’re having too much fun? Lame. Even though Koechner is technically the villain, I’m more inclined to root for him because he’s at least more entertaining to watch than these goody-two-shoes spoilsports.

The other problem is that after a good Busey-centric start, the movie gradually turns too jokey for its own good. A guy chopping his dick off to prevent the piranha gnawing on it from... reaching his balls, i guess, is a gleefully mordant joke. Turning the last 20 minutes into a series of dated Baywatch-cliches parodies is just kind of pathetic and desperate. Who besides Werner Herzog has even seen an episode of Baywatch this decade? Towards the end, things lurch from campy horror to broad comedy and the mild level of interest it’s been able to sustain up until that point quickly diminishes. To it’s credit, though, it does end with a final jokey twist which almost rivals the “where are the parents?” joke from the end of the 2010 version. That alone is enough to qualify it as a resounding “not as bad as it could have been.”  

PS: Check out Dan P's review over at his blog -- 

* Fun fact: every time someone types the phrase “sequel to the original remake” I die a little on the inside.

CHAINSAWNUKAH 2012 CHECKLIST!

LOVECRAFT ADAPTATION: No.
BOOBIES: Yeah, they've got boobies, but to tell you the truth not too many memorable ones. And I only remember like one set of 3D-DDs in the whole thing.

> or = HERSCHELL GORDON LEWIS LEVEL GORE: Enough to count, I suppose.
SEQUEL: Yep, sequel to original remake, possibly sequel to the original two.
OBSCURITY LEVEL: Mid. DTV, but well-publicized for this sort of thing.
MONSTERS: Piranahas, but not really.
SATANISTS: None.
ZOMBIES: No.
VAMPIRES: No.
SLASHERS: No.
CURSES: No.
ALEX MADE IT THROUGH AWAKE: N/A.
 

Friday, July 15, 2011

Piranha (2010 version)

PIRANHA [3-D?] (2010)
Dir. Alexandre Aja
Starring Steven R. McQueen, Elizabeth Shue, Adam Scott, Jerry O’Connell, and Ving Rhames (with Christopher Lloyd and Richard Dreyfuss for a combined 3 minutes).


I think most serious horror buffs have high hopes for Alexandre Aja. Not because of what he’s done, exactly, but because of the obvious potential for what he seems destined to do someday. He’s really only made one good movie out of four now, but his talent, imagination, and audacity are so readily on display that it seems like it has to be only a matter of time til he makes that great one. This ain’t it, but it’s fun and generally does what it’s trying to do.  Which is be a parodic remake of a parody of JAWS. So it’s cute but not really striving for greatness exactly. Which is kind of a shame because in some ways it could have been a legitimately great B-movie instead of a parody of one if they had tried a little harder.

There are actually some really inspired scenes of mayhem and gore here, and to his credit Aja knows to have his leads play it pretty straight. The setup about a single-mother sheriff and her older son and younger kids is positively Spielbergian in its commitment to earnestly corny familial relations. But Spielberg would have known that setup is not enough, you actually have to give them some arc, and Aja either doesn’t know that yet or doesn’t think it’s important in a movie like this. But of course it is.

In college, I took a few courses with Dr. Neal King, a professor of Sociology I guess but his interests were mostly in pop culture (he taught a class called “Action Cinema” and now has one simply called “Masculinity.” College is awesome.) Anyway, he claimed that nearly all successful films have an identifiable four-act structure, and as such follow a certain dramatic structure which reveals to the audience what the important narrative arcs are (it’s developments in the major thematic arcs which serve to structure the acts). As a guy who tends to be skeptical of that kind of generalization, I somewhat resisted the theory, but the more movies I see the more I realize not only that he was pretty much right, but that there’s a damn good reason most movies are set up this way. PIRANHA has a bunch of fun scenes and even some fun characters, but there’s no structure at all. It’s just a bunch of shit that happens and then it’s over. The characters seem to have a little personality but they have no arcs whatsoever, no one learns or grows or changes except that some of them are reduced to awesomely bloody tattered skeletons. There’s literally no story at all, just a bunch of scenes that happen to some people.

This makes it a curiously unsatisfying experience. Not that the pieces aren’t fun, but so little is attempted to make you care about what’s happening that it ends up feeling so slight it might float away. And it’s kind of a shame too, because Aja gets the tone pretty right. He knows it’s a comedy but he treats it in kind of an amiably serious fun way. He’s got a great little cast of fun performers who all seem more than game for the tone he’s trying for, but then none of them really get to do anything. They get introduced and then it’s straight to the feeding frenzy for all of them. So as fun as it is to watch those cartoony piranhas devastate the fleshy bodies of their victims, the added fun of caring about who is being eaten is mostly absent. There’s virtually no drama in a single death here – no hero gets a tragic or noble death, no villain really gets a satisfying piranha-assisted comeuppance. Half the fun of these films is the schadenfreude of watching some despicable character endanger everyone and get what’s coming to him – this one doesn’t really get much out of that dynamic because none of the characters are around long enough to have much impact, good or bad.

You might ague Jerry O’Connell’s Michael-Bay-filming-Girls-Gone-Wild* character is meant to be unlikable, but I don’t buy that he works on that level. He’s kind of an ass, but not so much that you’re really rooting for him to bite it (or, uh, get it bit, I guess). In fact, in a movie this broad a big cartoony performance like that kind of makes him annoyingly endearing instead of hateable (Aja does harness the immediate and overwhelming unlikability of Eli Roth to get one satisfying kill). But the true villain of the film is this douchebag frat boy who gets out of harm’s way by climbing into a motor boat and mowing down his peers as they get in his way. Now that’s a hateable bastard. What happens to him? We don’t even get to see! He falls into the water and the film cuts away without even showing him get bit. See, that’s exactly where I want to see you get creative with some horrible piranha gore!

On the other end of the spectrum, the heroes don’t get a lot of payoff either. A couple of the apparent main characters do die, but it’s dealt with completely indifferently. Someone who’s been, well, if not important, at least around since the beginning of the film will suddenly die this cruel, gruesome death in the middle of a scene and no one seems to comment on it or be much affected by it. The actors are likeable enough that you feel bad when they’re reduced to fish food, even with funny gimmicks like the stripper who gets completely eaten except for her skeleton and her floating silicone implants. That’s a funny concept, but it’s not as fun when you like the characters and are denied even a hint of pathos about their passing. Aja clearly want his characters to come across as sympathetic, but for some reason he completely misses every opportunity to create even the barest of drama.

This failure to take advantage of narrative arc applies to the structure of the story too, which has the distinct and odd feeling of a movie which is missing the final act. It’s all setup and a few teasers for the first hour, then all hell breaks loose with the admirable epic and memorable spring break massacre, then there’s one other smaller-scale setpiece which finally includes the apparent protagonist (played by Steve McQueen’s grandson, no shit!) and then just when it seems like it’s finally built some momentum it suddenly ends (OK, the joke they go out on is a thoroughly winning one, but still). Why spend all that time setting up the characters if they never go anywhere?

Now of course, I don’t need to remind you of the PIRANAHA series’ directorial legacy, and I’ll take it as a sign of Aja’s ambition that he’s associating his name with the series. But as of now, this is just one more example of his ability to tease us by coming frustrating close to greatness, only to fumble a few key aspects and sabotage all his good work.

Still, it delivers about all the piranha-themed carnage you could possibly desire, and even if it’s a little unsatisfying it’s got a good sense of puckish fun. I do wish I had seen it in 3-D. Oh well, that’s three more dollars for cheap hooch which arguably makes for an equally enjoyable augmentation.    

*Look at that haircut, that open shirt, that awkward manic overconfidence and fucking try to tell me he’s not playing Michael Bay.