Hideaway (1995)
Dir. Brett Leonard
Written by Dean Koontz (novel) Andrew Kevin
Walker and Neal Jimenez
Starring Jeff Goldblum, Christine Lahi, Jeremy
Sisto, Alfred Molina, Alicia Silverstone
"[My Dad is], like, really on edge - dying and all, you
know?"
When
I reviewed THE DEAD PIT last year, I laughed about this extremely earnest IMDB review of that movie that offers the criticism that it
“touches on controversial subjects like performing illegal lobotomies on
patients, but never digs deep enough to leave a lasting impression on the
viewer,” (this from a movie about an amnesiac woman running around a mental
institution in her underwear with a compulsive bomber, trying to convince the
staff that her evil doctor dad has returned from the dead as some kind of
zombie wizard) but concedes that it is “A must see for [Brett] Leonard fans
interested in his filmography.” Hey, I figured, even the director of THE
LAWNMOWER MAN must have a mom or sister or somebody who wanted to try and say
something nice on the internet about his movie, resulting in bit of writing so
well-meaning and obviously phony that it’s actually kind of heartwarming.* I
never even considered the review might have been written in earnest because,
come on, what Brett Leonard fans?
But now, having seen
DEAD PIT, LAWNMOWER MAN, his acting role as “Klown Performer (uncredited)” in
KILLER KLOWNS FROM OUTER SPACE and now HIDEAWAY, I’m in serious danger myself
of courting the label of “Brett Leonard fan interested in his filmography.”
Well, probably not the “fan” part, thankfully, but I must admit, there exists
within me a minute but unmistakable openness to watching VIRTUOSITY, and maybe
even MAN-THING at some point in my life. Not because there’s even the slightest,
most flickering possibility that they might be good, of course, but because
there is something to Leonard’s films (at least the three I have seen),
some kind of bizarre alchemy between their abject, farcical shittiness and
their absolute, unshakable certainty that they’re blowing your fuckin’ mind.
It’s not quality, oh god no. It’s not even comedy, for the most part, because
they’re mostly too boring for that. But it is, honest to goodness, the mark of
an auteur. A powerfully shitty one, to be sure, but an auteur, nonetheless, a
unique artistic impulse that you couldn’t fake or imitate.
This image depicts the process whereby movies are ectoplasmically excreted from Brett Leonard's body. |
In fact, I noticed one
of Leonard’s most notable auteurial ticks almost immediately: terrible,
terrible early 90’s CGI, and lots of it. To get to it, though, we’ve gotta make
it through a few minutes of live action preamble. Fortunately, this is the best
part of the whole movie, as aspiring teenage Satanic killer Jeremy Sisto (very soon to
flirt with mainstream success thanks to CLUELESS before lapsing into a
comfortable career playing horror villains and TV detectives) poses two female
corpses (his mother and sister, it will later be confirmed) in a praying
position using barbed wire, goes upstairs to his satanic lair / bedroom, takes off his shirt, puts
on some rockin’ industrial metal (possibly KMFDM’s Go To Hell, which is
listed first on the soundtrack?), hail’s Satan, and sacrifices himself to the
dark one by falling into an elaborate sacrificial knife cradle thing. Too late,
his dad arrives home to discover what he’s done, though for some durn reason
that surely has nothing to do with him being the one recognizable cast member
who serves no obvious narrative purpose that would justify hiring a name actor,
they awkwardly cut around showing his face at this time.
But who gives a fuck
about Dad, when we can follow the killer on his celestial journey into CGI
hell? It looks like this, but for the entire credits sequence:
“This movie shows where
it is you go, and what happens to you, in a way that has never been seen in
its, uh, elaborateness,” Jeff Goldblum accurately explains in this breathless five-minute promo for the movie.
But wait, it’s only five
minutes into the movie, and our presumed villain is already dead and in Hell.
So what exactly is this movie about? Well, to answer that question, we skip
ahead some unspecified amount of time, and embed ourselves in the
tragedy-scarred but loving and comfortable family of Hatch Harrison (Jeff
Goldblum, “Freak #1” in DEATH WISH), his wife (Christine Lahti, a two-time Oscar
nominated actress with a lengthy career of well-received dramas none of which
you or I will ever see, a fact which I mention only because it adds pathos to
her punishingly thankless role as “threatened wife” in a Brett Leonard movie)
and their ill-defined sexy (?) young daughter Regina (Alicia Silverstone, THE
KILLING OF A SACRED DEER, whose role [and likeness on the poster] I suspect
became more prominent when it began to look like her upcoming CLUELESS [also
featuring her HIDEAWAY co-star Jeremy Sisto!] would be a big hit). There is a
lot of saccharine hugging and meal-preparing and a surprising amount of time
with a shirtless, ripped Jeff Goldblum. But then tragedy strikes: there is a
car crash, a pointlessly distended action sequence with the car in the water,
and then Goldblum dies.
Well, we’re now 15
minutes into the movie, and both the assumed antagonist and the
assumed protagonist are dead, so what in the world is this movie abou…? ah,
here we go, Dr. Herbert West Dr. Jonas Nyburn (Alfred Molina, that guy
who won’t throw Indy the whip at the beginning of RAIDERS OF THE LOST ARK) is
here with an unspecified experimental procedure which reanimates the dead. This
seems like a pretty big deal which would be worth exploring in some detail or
at least commenting on, but actually it’s just a minor plot device which is
necessary only to explain why Jeff Goldblum can still be the main character
after he died and also got a CGI tour of heaven (in his case, tinted blue
instead of red. In a way that has never been seen in its, uh,
elaborateness!). So he’s back, and, in what is unquestionably the movie’s
greatest moment, he takes the opportunity to bang his wife, and when he
orgasms, the camera zooms in on his eyeball and you can see CGI heaven in
there!
This doesn’t prove to
be, like, a supernatural premonition or anything, it’s just that, isn’t really
good sex basically like heaven? HIDEAWAY posits that it is. I mean, he’d know.
He was just there.
Anyway, right, the plot.
So basically what happens is that a newly reanimated Hatch starts to have
dreams, and eventually waking visions, of murdering people. He’ll black out,
have a vision of murdering someone, and come to in some different place a little
while later, in one instance with blood on him. And sometimes in his visions he
sees Jeremy Sisto, and sometimes we see visions of Jeremy Sisto being
replaced by Jeff Goldblum. So, what, did his little jaunt to the afterlife
cause him to come back possessed, or something? At first it seems basically
certain that he’s moonlighting as a possessed killer, but then he tries to
bring the cops to the murder scene, and there’s no sign of a body or anything
out of the ordinary.
What’s going on here?
Well, the genius of HIDEAWAY is that it communicates the story so poorly that
it takes one of the most mercilessly rote thriller plots in history and
actually makes it seem mysterious, primarily because it's not initially clear what chronological relationship the opening sequence with Sisto and the subsequent death of Hatch share. Are they simultaneous? Did one happen years before? Is one set in the uncertain future? What the fuck is going on? Is Hatch
psychically remembering things Jeremy Sisto did years ago? Is Hatch actually
Sisto, somehow? Split personality? Premonition? Possession?
Touchdown! |
It turns out to be (sort
of spoiler, although I’m pretty sure this was meant to be clear and it’s only
made interesting because the movie makes such a muddled mess out of a
straightforward scenario) the most dull possibility: Jeremy Sisto (who the
movie inexplicably begins to refer to as “Vassago” at some point, so I will do
the same) is actually alive again, thanks to the same miraculously reanimating
shvitz or whatever it was that brought back our hero, and now they are
psychically linked due to their shared time in the CGI beyond (think of it as a hilariously convoluted BLOOD LINK). That makes,
unfortunately, for a rather dull narrative with an inactive, ineffectual
protagonist who spends most of the runtime trying to catch up to what the
audience already knows, and the remainder trying to convince various skeptical
and dismissive authority figures (his wife, a detective [Kenneth Welsh, Windom
Earle on Twin Peaks], his psychiatrist [Don S. Davis, Maj. Briggs on Twin
Peaks], his psychic [Rae Dawn Chong, COMMANDO]) to do something to stop the
carnage. Or, that failing, at least to convince them he’s not nuts (his
strategy to that end is to shout incoherently at everyone about the voices in
his head, which does not prove to be the most effective approach). Meanwhile, it turns
out that “Vassago” can see through Hatch’s eyes too, which turns into a serious
inconvenience when he becomes obsessed with making Regina his next victim.
Oddly, he fixates on her not because of his psychic connection with her dad
(that just makes the stalking more convenient), but because he happens to
coincidentally run into her at some kind of goth metal nightclub that they both
apparently frequent. Golly, small world, ain’t it?
Watching the movie in
2018, the most enjoyable aspects come from the dated 1995 aesthetic, amplified to absurd magnitude by the film’s feverish
attempts to be stylish and trendy. Any time Goldblum is wearing clothes, expect
them to be roughly the size of a standard circus bigtop tent; every time a song
plays, expect it to be some kind of edgy industrial metal. And most of all,
expect that every time Jeremy Sisto appears, he will look like he’s auditioning
for the role of “most disaffected teen in the Matrix”:
It turns out he’s
actually wearing those sunglasses all the time even at night because he suffers
from a condition which I believe is medically identified as “metaphor-induced
light sensitivity,” commonly known as “Riddick Syndrome,” where he can see
perfectly in the dark, but light hurts his eyes. The movie is either A)
uncharacteristically restrained on this point, relying on a commendably cinematic “show-don’t-tell” style of visual communication which allows the viewer
to realize this fact only very late in the proceedings or B) incoherent enough
that it fails to communicate this point for most of its runtime. It keeps
seeming like this will be a relevant detail, but, like the fact that Vassago and Hatch (sometimes, when the movie remembers) psychically share pain when one of them
is injured, it turns out to not matter at all. Guess it’s just one of those
eccentric little details that provide the nuance and texture you demand in a
movie that begins with a character’s face on a CGI blob flying into a huge
Koosh ball made of screaming red skeletons.
Goldblum is Goldblumy
enough to be worth watching, and “Vassago” --who is incorporating the corpses
of his victims into a large-scale piece of industrial art in his secret lair in
an abandoned amusement park**-- is a big enough cheeseball that he’s pretty
entertaining. You’ve also got the silly 90’s fashion, the atrocious CGI, and
the openly ludicrous (but absolutely dead serious) plot to keep you entertained.
That’s enough to keep its reasonable 96 minute runtime from becoming a total
slog, because you’re never too far away from something agreeably silly
happening, but even so, the movie is pretty draggy and dull for long stretches,
especially in the middle (as Hatch very, very slowly begins to acknowledge and
understand what the audience already knows from the poster's tagline). It’s obviously never going to be
anywhere in the same time zone as actual suspense, so when it’s also not very
eventful, you’re not left with a lot to hold onto. But with some friends and a good
supply of booze, it’s certainly batty (and Goldblumy) enough to generate a
good time, if you’re in the mood for a particularly egregious slice of 1990s
unselfconscious hackery.
Speaking of
unselfconscious hacks, Dean Koontz (author of the novel of the same name which
served as the basis for this script) was apparently very unhappy with the movie
and tried to have his name removed. Stephen King had the same reaction to
LAWNMOWER MAN (and how shitty does your movie have to be before Stephen King
wants his name removed? His name is on THINNER and THE LANGOLIERS and MAXIMUM
OVERDRIVE!) but I’d say King’s umbrage was more justified, because while Koontz
complained about the movie’s supposed infidelity to his novel, the only major
difference I can detect in a side-by-side comparison of the two synopses is
that in the book, Alicia Silverstone’s pointless daughter character is younger,
and is in the process of being adopted. Or, as Koontz put it:
Although she isn’t the female lead, a young disabled girl named
Regina is the heart of HIDEAWAY both in terms of plot and thematic structure.
She is a symbol of innocence, of purity. The antagonist, Vassago, is actually
Evil personified, and like most evil with a small e and like all Evil with a
capital E, he is motivated more powerfully by the desire to destroy innocence
and pollute purity than he is by anything else. In a structural sense,
therefore, Regina is the sun, while all the other characters are planets
revolving around her. Without Regina–ten years old, disabled, charming,
acerbic, funny, indomitable–the story doesn’t just collapse: it evaporates.
That sounds like the absolute most asinine
concept ever conceived by man, which raises the interesting question of whether
it’s possible that Brett Leonard actually slightly improved this story.
And that’s the only difference Koontz mentions in his nearly 3,000-word victory
lap on the merits of his novel vs the movie. As far as I can tell, every other
moronic plot detail came directly from him. I may, perhaps, be disposed to
treat him uncharitably in light of the insufferably smug tower of self-pity / self-congratulations he published on his website regarding all those mean old
atheists who wrote him angry letters about the pervasive religiosity in
HIDEAWAY [I would badly love to edit what follows for concision, but I think
you need to experience it in its full masturbatory glory to understand just how
unendurable the whole experience is]:
The hate mail generated by HIDEAWAY came entirely from atheists. I
hasten to clarify that not all atheists are intolerant or cranks. Like
believers, most just want to get along, to have their share of Starbucks
cappuccinos and Krispy Kreme doughnuts, to know true love or at least true
affection, to buy cool shoes, and to avoid being caught in the crossfire
between rap stars at the Vibe Awards.
My fifty seethingly angry correspondents were furious with me
because the story line of HIDEAWAY assumed the existence of God and Heaven.
They accused me of corrupting the minds of innocent youth, of being a paid
shill for the Vatican, and of being a moron.
I found it curious that
none of those letters chastised me for the fact that the story line of HIDEAWAY
also assumed the existence of Satan and Hell. I could only suppose that they
considered it enlightened and healthy to instill in our innocent youth a belief
in things demonic, though I didn’t see how that squared with atheism.
While
I haven’t completely cataloged every other possible competitor, I feel pretty
comfortable with my working hypothesis that this is the single most insipid
thought that any adult has ever put into words. One gets the sense that Koontz may harbor a sense of his own overwhelming intellectual superiority which is not necessarily backed up by evidence, a suspicion strengthened by the fact that his screed also includes the line “I
don’t mean to compare myself to Dickens,” which is true in the sense that he
then goes on to imply that I bet Charles Dickens never had to put up with
this shit. So honestly I’m kinda thinking he and Leonard deserve each
other.
PS: Also, nearly half of his “notes from the
author” consists of his angry, one-way correspondence with the Japanese CEO of
Universal/MCA, who he exclusively calls --and this is true and I urge you to check for yourself if you don’t believe me-- “Mr. Teriyaki.”
This was posted in 2010.
Which makes it just possible that Leonard might
actually be too good for this material.
* Even the most doting
mother in history would feel obligated to tactfully point out that plot makes
no sense, otherwise it just wouldn’t be believable.
** Remember --and I must
stress this part now because you will have reason to doubt by the end of this
review-- this story was written by an adult man whose books have sold over 450
million copies and who is widely regarded as one of the most successful fiction
writers in history.
CHAINSAWNUKAH
2018 CHECKLIST!
Searching For Bloody
Pictures
TAGLINE
|
Hatch Harrison was pronounced dead on arrival.
After two hours, the doctors brought him back. But he didn't come back alone.
|
TITLE ACCURACY
|
No obvious meaning of any kind. Maybe his full
name is Hatch Hideaway Harrison?
|
LITERARY ADAPTATION?
|
Yes, from the novel by Dean Koontz.
|
SEQUEL?
|
None
|
REMAKE?
|
None
|
COUNTRY OF ORIGIN
|
USA
|
HORROR SUB-GENRE
|
Serial Killer / Psychic / Satanism
|
SLUMMING A-LISTER?
|
Oh, the whole cast.
|
BELOVED HORROR ICON?
|
Jeremy Sisto has a long enough horror career
to count. And Brett Leonard is by no means beloved by anyone, but he just
might be iconic. Oh, and Andrew Kevin Walker wrote
|
NUDITY?
|
None
|
SEXUAL ASSAULT?
|
None
|
WHEN ANIMALS ATTACK!
|
None that I recall
|
GHOST/ ZOMBIE / HAUNTED BUILDING?
|
No
|
POSSESSION?
|
At first it seems like Hatch is possessed, but
it turns out he’s not. Then at the end, maybe it turns out that “Vassago” was
possessed by some kind of Helldemon?
|
CREEPY DOLLS?
|
None
|
EVIL CULT?
|
None, though “Vassago” is definitely operating
in a Satan-worshipping mode, he seems to be on his own.
|
MADNESS?
|
Much talk about it, but Hatch turns out to be
totally sane. I mean, I guess the serial killer is insane.
|
TRANSMOGRIFICATION?
|
No
|
VOYEURISM?
|
Very much so, with the two leads seeing
through each other’s eyes.
|
MORAL OF THE STORY
|
If you’re ever in the position to be
miraculously brought back from the dead through unspecified means, ask about
the side effects first.
|
Great review as ever! Although if anything you've undersold how bizarre the Koontz rant is. It got to the point where he was sending WW2 news clippings to the Japanese CEO where I just had to stare at a wall for a bit. Like, no matter how badly the adaptation of his book was going, did it not occur to Koontz that references to Bridge Over The River Kwai would not help his case? And if it didn't happen and this is a joke, it doesn't make him seem like a very nice guy...
ReplyDeleteAnd I actually kinda liked the couple of his books that I've read. Not world beating literature by any means. But still.
I mean, that rant would be embarrassing if it was written in 1981, but for it to be from 2010 is just mind-boggling. This is clearly a person who has not been on planet Earth for quite some time.
Delete