Showing posts with label JUGGALOS. Show all posts
Showing posts with label JUGGALOS. Show all posts

Monday, November 10, 2014

Jug Face

Jug Face (2013) aka The Pit
Dir. and written by Chad Crawford Kinkle
Starring Laura Ashley Carter, Sean Bridgers, Larry Fessenden, Sean Young




One thing to immediately like about JUG FACE? No juggalos at all. That’s always something I look for in a movie, and the title here was definitely making me nervous on that front. No, this is a rare movie with no obvious connection to Insane Clown Posse at all. Not so much as a drop of Faygo in the whole thing.


JUG FACE centers on teenage country bumpkin Ada (Laura Ashley Carter), a young woman just on the cusp of adulthood who has a lot of problems. First, she’s stuck in some backwoods nowhere, an insular community who stay to themselves and don’t appear to have evolved much for the last 200 or so years. I think a lot of folks in middle America can identify with that. Also, she’s pregnant, and the father is her asshole brother who has no interest in helping her at all and just wants to cover his own ass. OK, a little less relatable there, but you know, unwanted pregnancy is scary, we can still get with her on that. Also, and maybe I should have mentioned this first, the community is some sort of murderous cult, who worship a backwoods mud pit and have to make periodic sacrifices to it or face the wrath of the mysterious forces within. They know who to sacrifice because the local half-wit (Sean Bridger, managing to commendably hold onto his dignity in a very tricky role) goes into a trance and makes a ceramic jug with the chosen victim’s face on it. And Ada is next on the chopping block. Can this girl catch a break or what? Admittedly this particular issue is probably not in the experience of most of my readers here, but I would argue it is probably the most interesting of Ada's problems, the real "hook" as they call it out in Hollywood I think. At least in the top three, anyway.

Ada gets a little head.

This first feature for writer/director Chad Crawford Kinkle has some rough edges, but still manages to create a pretty compelling portrait of rural desperation, and coasts a very long way on its weird and interesting premise (the supernatural mudpuddle god, is specifically what I’m referring to). I love the idea of this totally unexplained mysterious local force in the woods, unknown to anyone but the adherents of this tiny, isolated religious community. There’s a pretty cool opening sequence explaining the history of this phenomenon from the perspective of children’s drawings, presumably as they’re taught the old ways by their parents. The details of this dark backwoods religion feel very believable and lived-in, so the whole world of the movie feels unexpectedly rich and weighty, even when the actual narrative doesn’t necessarily always support it. And as an added bonus, it proves beyond any doubt that THE VILLAGE is an idiotic piece of shit. So, you want to live a cloistered, quarantined* existence away from everyone else, huh? Well, just fucking do it, you don’t have to buy authentic 16th-century hats and pretend it’s hundreds of years ago. Just don’t leave, worship your goddam mud puddle and stop being such a bunch of drama queens. Everyone here is AWARE of the outside world, they just don't GO there, because their home is all they know and it's immediately clear they're woefully unprepared to live anywhere else. See? No fucking monster suits required, you overcomplicating jackasses.


Anyway, this is obviously better than THE VILLAGE, but so is a poke in the eye with a sharp stick, which at least doesn't condescend to you. JUG FACE has its problems though. The biggest is that this creepy, elegant concept of the mysterious pit in the woods is weakened somewhat by crappy effects and a pervasive lack of atmosphere. Kinkle strikes me as a talented writer, but his visual sense is disappointingly literal, point-and-shoot kind of stuff that doesn’t manage to draw much tension out of the endless-seeming woods or manage to do much with the few interesting visual icons the movie offers. This is mostly not an enormous problem, but a few times when the movie attempts effects probably beyond its budget, it looks chintzy and ridiculous. The scenes where Ada has visions of people dying in the pit are a painful combination of tired EVIL-DEAD cams, cheap color filters, and muddled chaotic editing, basically the three most played-out horror tricks in the trade. They actually manages to diminish what should be, by all rights, a pretty disturbing idea. Horror fans are used to having to deal with a few concessions to a punishingly low budget, but a more troubling problem is that despite a well-written script scene to scene, the whole enterprise lacks a suitable structure, resulting in a scenario that never escalates satisfactorily, and consequently builds to a bit of a shrug for the climax.

Sean Bridger has some nice jugs. Huh, didn't figure this topic would lend itself so easy to sex puns.

Still, it's an ambitious and unique effort overall, and its flaws aren’t serious enough to overwhelm the obvious good. The cast --including this year’s Chainsawnukah VIP Larry Fessenden** as Ada’s Dad and the World’s-Biggest-James-Woods-fan Sean Young as his mom-- are uniformly strong, and contribute to that believable backwoods aesthetic. Even while the visuals may not convey it, the performances and production design do a lot to convince you of the authenticity of this tiny, insular throwback. Through sheer willpower more than effective filmmaking, the thing eventually manages to cultivate an acceptable sense of doom and isolation. Creepy detail abound (I especially enjoy the stylized "jug faces" that spell doom for their living doppelgangers, and are ritualistically preserved afterwards) and even though I wish the film was a little more stylish, in a way, the lack of style and atmosphere actually gives the whole thing an unsettling sense of banal reality. There’s nothing gothic or dramatic about this damn hole in the ground, it's just an ordinary, unimpressive fetid mud puddle. Except that it controls life and death. In some ways, that's a lot scarier than it would be if they tarted it up with a lot of horror film fanfare and rigamarole.


There's nothing especially perverse or evil about the community, either; they're just a bunch of average, mostly well-meaning hicks doing this because it's their stupid religion, handed down by generations of other hicks just like them. The only difference from other hill people all over this country is that if anything, this bunch are way much more justified in their religious beliefs than their evangelical contemporaries. Kinda makes me wonder if there's a religious allegory here somewhere, but if there is I can't quite see it. Rather, I think the real effort here is to create a potent cocktail of helpless, remorseless persecution with no way out, and on that level, the film succeeds handily. We may not exactly be able to exactly identify with Ada's specific problems, but the film makes the loneliness and desperation of her situation all too clear. On the obvious merits here, I'm definitely looking forward to Kinkle's next film; hopefully by the time he gets to that one he can hone his visual skills a little bit and come up with a look that suits the unnerving themes of his stories a little better. Either that, or switch to an all-pottery storytelling format. He's already got that one down cold.

*Thanks Alex

**Winner of the Chainsawnukah 2014 "Yo go, girl!" award for unexpected greatness in BENEATH.



CHAINSAWNUKAH 2014 CHECKLIST!

The Hunt For Dread October


  • LITERARY ADAPTATION: Nope
  • SEQUEL: None
  • REMAKE: Neinn
  • FOREIGNER: Homegrown American.
  • FOUND-FOOTAGE CLUSTERFUCK: None
  • SLUMMING A-LISTER: Sean Young?
  • BELOVED HORROR ICON: Larry Fuckin' Fessenden
  • BOOBIES: Yes
  • SEXUAL ASSAULT: No, the movie assures us that the icky incest with the asshole brother is 100% consensual.
  • DISMEMBERMENT PLAN: Lots. Couple people get more or less ripped to shreds.
  • HAUNTED HOUSE: No
  • MONSTER: None
  • THE UNDEAD: Ada sees ghosts of people who tried to escape their fate
  • POSSESSION: None
  • SLASHER/GIALLO: No
  • PSYCHO KILLERS (Non-slasher variety): Murderous mud pit?
  • EVIL CULT: Hell yeah
  • (UNCANNY) VALLEY OF THE DOLLS: I think the jug faces probably count.
  • TRANSMOGRIFICATION: None
  • OBSCURITY LEVEL: Pretty high, no major theatrical release or stars
  • MORAL OF THE STORY: Don't ever disobey evil magical artifacts that want you to be sacrificed for their pleasure
  • TITLE ACCURACY: There is indeed a jug face.
  • ALEX MADE IT THROUGH AWAKE: N/A

Ada has conversations with a female cashier, and a long scene where her mom screams at her that she's a slut but isn't specifically referring to any particular man. Progress, here we come!


Tuesday, November 27, 2012

Sinister

Sinister (2012)
Dir. Scott Derrickson
Written by Scott Derrickson, C. Robert “Massawyrm” Cargill
Starring Ethan Hawke, Juliet Rylance, Fred Thompson, Vincent D’Onofrio




    This ghostly flick from the director of HELLRAISER V: INFERNO and one of the reviewers from Ain’t it Cool News may not have the classiest pedigree in the world, but it does have something. It’s hard to describe what that actual something is, but I think it’s in there. Somewhere. When I take it apart and start thinking about the actual content, it seems very stupid and gimmicky, and not even a very good gimmick. But for some reason while I was watching this film, I was mostly into it. I don’t know that I could really call it a good movie, but somewhere, somehow, this one managed to get to me in spite of everything. I mean, there’s only one thing in this whole mess that I couldn’t straight-up predict, and even that was pretty obviously one possible way it could go. And there’s certainly nothing in here that you haven’t seen before, and a lot of it you’ve seen done before much better. But I dunno, man. Somethin’.

    Oh wait, I just realized I know exactly what. Ethan Hawke. There’s one and only one reason this unimaginative gloom-fest works, and it’s Ethan Hawke acting his scruffily handsome ass off trying to make us care about the gimmicky found-footage conceit here and succeeding handily. Derrickson and Cargill owe Mr. Hawke a minimum of a hundred blowjobs each for taking this movie up about a dozen notches, but maybe he at least owes them the honor of receiving them for providing him an opportunity to play an interesting, nuanced character in a genre movie that takes itself surprisingly seriously and genuinely wants you to leave horrified, not just scared.

    We know Derrickson has the capacity to make shit out of shinola (witness his lifeless and mind-numbing remake of THE DAY THE EARTH STOOD STILL) so I’m hesitant to give him too much credit here. But I will say he’s obviously trying, laboring to make something genuinely dark and shocking even if he doesn’t always have the imagination to back it up. He asserts his intent from the very first frame, where we silently watch a super-8 video of a family of four, hung by their necks with bags over their head until the last kick. It’s horrifying and --crucially-- patient, lingering on the images of horror rather than just leaping out at us with them (although he’ll hilariously try the latter approach for the very last frame of the movie). Now, intending to shock is not always the same thing as legitimately shocking us. CHAOS, right? There’s a big difference between conjuring genuinely disturbing psychological unease and X-treme hardcore wannabe nonsense. As much as it grasps for the genuinely depraved, SINISTER is seldom imaginative enough to come up with anything truly upsetting. But fortunately that’s where Hawke takes over and carries the rest of the movie on his back, kicking and screaming, into somewhere in the realm of honest-to-good goodness.

Well, I guess I do owe [the Robot Devil] for this unholy... ACTING ABILITY!!

Hawke plays Ellison Oswalt, (named after Harlan Ellison and Patton Oswalt, the same way that all those awful horror movies in the 90’s had characters named Carpenter and Romero and Ken Russell and so on) a nice guy with a cute cracker-y family who has fallen on hard times as a writer of true-crime type novels (which come to think about it, Patton Oswalt really ought to try that, I bet he’d be great). Unbeknownst to the family, he’s moved them into the house of the murder victims from the opening hanging scene, convinced it’s the inspiration he needs to write another great book. Unfortunately, his wife’s getting sick of their lives being shaken up so he can pursue his career, the local cops (not entirely unreasonably) think he’s a tabloid-chasing lowlife, he’s running out of money, and wouldn’t you know it, the house is haunted. You know, by ghosts.

The only reason any of this is interesting in the slightest is that Hawke plays Oswalt in a very unique way. He’s fundamentally a nice guy who genuinely loves his wife and kids and wants the best for them. But he’s also somewhat selfishly pursuing his own dreams of recaptured literary glory to the detriment of everyone else, rationalizing his own pride as an attempt to provide a better life for his family. Oswalt’s first book was a hugely acclaimed, influential work which helped bring justice to an unsolved case, but since then he’s become a bit of a hack, “making mistakes,” as the local cops put it, and generally pissing away his good name in a desperate effort to reach the kind of glory that mostly only comes as the result of being in the right place at the right time. So when he finds a mysterious box in the attic which includes gruesome super-8 footage of five murders across more than 50 years, he seriously considers turning it over to the police but can’t quite resist the temptation to be a hero again by solving the mystery himself. Which turns out to be kind of a mistake, if you’ll indulge me a moment of editorializing.


Yes, yes, you see dead people. Get to the point.

What works about the performance is that Hawke makes this guy’s desperation genuinely palpable. In fact, the tension comes more from how hard it is to watch Oswalt paint himself into a corner than from our fear of ghostly kids running around. As Oswalt (and the audience) work their way through the films (all of which have cutesy titles which relate to the murders, for instance the hanging family is called “Hangin’ Around ‘11”) you can tell he knows in his heart that this is a bad idea, and in fact bad for him both personally and psychologically... but he can’t stop himself. He wants to believe he can make this work. Even as the evidence that this is a terrible idea piles up, he can’t quite let go of his dream that this will be the thing that puts him back on top. We can’t always identify with the idea of being hunted by an ancient Babylonian demon that looks like if the Joker was a member of Insane Clown Posse (unless we saw EXORCIST PART II, and even then only the first part), but we can all identify with being the guy who just so desperately needs this one thing to work out that he at first ignores, and then rationalizes, and finally tries to live with all the horrible consequences that are piling up at the foot of his aspirations.

    The drama works like a charm, but the actual horror stuff can be pretty clunky. There are a whole lot of scenes of Hawke fearfully walking through his darkened house (and never turning on a light) which start off tense but eventually get repetitive, and get even worse when they’re accompanied by a bunch of cheesy looking ghostly kids running around. And the less said about the ultimate reveal of why this is happening, the better. But surprisingly, the central found footage gimmick actually works pretty well. Unlike most found footage clusterfucks these days, I don’t detect any kind of commentary about our society being obsessed with documenting reality or creating meaning through images and so forth. Nor do these found films attempt to “put you in the moment” like way something like V/H/S does -- they’re mostly set in the past, for one thing, and don’t have a lot of that stupid wobbling that most practitioners of this questionable art seem to think is necessary. They’re scary just because they’re showing you something pretty horrible, making you party to whatever sick mind would do these things. It’s silent, deliberate, slow, gruesome (although unfortunately unimaginative), and the grainy super-8 footage and clattering projector remind you that there’s nothing our hero can do, we’re completely helpless to save anyone here. Derrickson actually did some pretty good found footage stuff in his DTV HELLRAISER V as well, so maybe that’s his thing. One rookie error he makes, though, is occasionally putting the film’s (quite good) score over the found footage. Bad call, brother; you can either have fancy Hollywood manipulation tricks or you can have your raw, disturbing found footage. Can’t have both at the same time

Man, how have they not made a Half Life movie with Hawke as Gordon Freeman?

    Still, there’s some signs that some serious thought was put into this movie. Briefly and bafflingly, Vincent D’Onofrio appears as Professor Exposition on Oswalt’s computer, communicating with him via Skype. I assumed that it was another attempt at the raw video footage thing, but it’s awkward and uncinematic and distracting and I thought it was a bad idea. But then I realized there’s actually a good reason for it -- Oswalt never leaves the house for the whole movie. Never goes to a bar, never gets a haircut, never buys groceries. The house is his prison, and without realizing it the movie’s small scope makes it feel claustrophobic and tense. A trip out into the real world, away from all the ghosty hijinks, would defuse this tension, and I admire Derrickson for realizing that. He should have just thought of a reason for D’Onofrio to make a house call, though, because that shit with the computer is a nonstarter.

    Anyway, the combination of a serious tone, a serious actor, and serious ambition (if not always serious imagination) combine for an end result which is, if not seriously good, at least seriously something. There’s a boldness and a commitment to the movie that I respect, and --at least in part-- responded to. When it’s short on ideas, it’s usually got the filmmaking competence to go the distance anyway, and Hawke’s constantly riveting performance takes us the rest of the way there. Easily the better of the two movies about ancient Babylonian demons I saw this Chainsawnukah season, although to be fair this one doesn’t have James Earl Jones wearing a cool locust headdress and sitting on an ornate throne. That may not be saying much, but it’s saying something.

And don't forget to check out Dan P's take in ABBOT AND JASON MEET BEFORE SUNSET.

CHAINSAWNUKAH 2012 CHECKLIST!

LOVECRAFT ADAPTATION: No.
BOOBIES: Don't think so.
> or = HERSCHELL GORDON LEWIS LEVEL GORE: Hmm, tough one. There's not much out-and-out gore, but some pretty rough murders all the same. When the gore comes, it's usually implied rather than shown, so I guess I'll say no.
SEQUEL: None.
OBSCURITY LEVEL: Low. Well-advertised studio picture.
MONSTERS: Demons?
SATANISTS: Nah.
ZOMBIES: No.
VAMPIRES: No.
SLASHERS: A serial killer, sure.
CURSES: Definitely.
ALEX MADE IT THROUGH AWAKE: Awake and entertained.