Showing posts with label JIM MICKLE. Show all posts
Showing posts with label JIM MICKLE. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 10, 2015

Stake Land

Stake Land (2010)
Dir. Jim Mickle
Written by Nick Damici, Jim Mickle
Starring Nick Damici, Connor Paolo, Danielle Harris, Kelly McGillis, Michael Cerveris.




When was it, exactly, that vampires got mixed up in the Apocalypse? It used to be a personal thing, with the vampires. They romanced ya a little, maybe tried to steal your women, but they also appreciated the finer things in life, they had castles, nice suits, capes, shit like that. Classy shit. A personal touch. But somewhere along the line they lost their way, gave up the chase, the intimate back-and-forth dance between ambiguously ethnic middle-aged European vamps and hypnotized women with heaving bosoms. They started running around growling and shit, shooting automatic weapons, and just generally experiencing some mission drift, finally setting their sights on the total collapse of civilization.* Man, standards slipping everywhere. Nowadays if you see a vampire, he’s liable to be wandering a dessicated hellscape, screaming incoherently and trying to bite your face off.** It’s a good thing Bela Lugosi didn’t live to see this day, because if he had…well, he would have been really, really old.


I wonder if maybe it’s Werner Herzog’s fault, by rewiring the NOSFERATU story into an apocalyptic allegory of Nazism? Or maybe Danny Boyle’s fault for turning zombies into athletic, predatory disease-carriers, which then somehow cross-bred with vampires in the collective mind of classic monster fans (what’s next, an apocalypse of mummies?) Who knows, but nowadays these fucking things are everywhere, from I AM LEGEND (the original novel of which is likely the first to imagine such a scenario) to PRIEST to NIGHT WATCH to UNDERWORLD. One person I know you can’t blame is Steven Seagal. He heroically tried to kill of the genre with his assertively anti-entertainment career nadir, AGAINST THE DARK, which even I, a trained and licensed Seagalogist who has seen literally every single Seagal movie, took an unprecedented four tries to finally make it through. If that roaring black hole of all artistic credibility, pop sensibility, and human compassion failed to rid us of this apocalyptic vampire trope, I’m afraid it’s here to stay.

try harder.

If that’s true, though, at least there are a few good role models for them. DAYBREAKERS was pretty damn great (shameless plug: every time don’t see the Spierig Bros' awesome new one, PREDESTINATION, a baby vampire loses its bat wings) and now we also got this STEAKLAND one, a sequel to Kristen Stewart’s 2009 coming-of-age tale ADVENTURELAND, this time set in a steakhouse later in life as she battles alcoholism and the lingering sense that she missed nah, I apologize, I just mistyped the title and couldn’t resist. I know that’s a weak pun to spend so much time on but come on, I’m only human. Cut me some slack. I’ve written 60 horror movie reviews in the last four months, and I’m just struggling to prevent them from melting into one long lumbering sludge of lukewarm praise and overuse of the word “phantasmagoric.” Actually this one is a mildly generic but well-appointed little apocalypse tale, you know, one of those one where there’s some grizzled badass (writer Nick Damici, all of Jim Mickle’s movies, plus one other) who roams the broken graveyard of our once noble civilization and gradually picks up a rag-tag group of survivors who bond and become a family but are menaced by robots, zombies, werewolves, mummies, Frankensteins, vampires, Black Lagoonians, whatever lazy pop-culture ghoul of yesteryear had the highest box-office number in the last quarter.


That sounds cynical, probably because it is. But if this one doesn’t exactly forge bold new territory, it makes up for it by at least doing a strong take on the familiar beats. Mickle has a good sense of atmosphere, and does a very credible job of making his vampiric postapocalyptic world feel rich, authentic, and lived-in. Tons of people with interesting, dirty faces (including producer and this year’s Chainsawnukah VIP Larry Fessenden as an ornery bartender), nice, quiet character moments, and a strong eye for detail and place. The movie’s best moments tend to be the smaller ones; the team sitting around the campfire together telling stories, bonding. The long, quiet marches through ragged Eastern woodland, basking in the natural beauty which is gradually taking back the world for itself. The characters feel authentic and likable, and I appreciate that despite the apocalypse, this isn’t one of those movies where the world is full of rape gangs on souped-up 4-wheelers. You see a few people who have taken to banditry and worse, but mostly when they come across new people everyone is frankly glad to be seeing another human face, and only want to help each other. There is a sense of community in most of the places they visit, the kind of bond that develops between people who have had to struggle together to survive. To me, that feels a lot more authentic than a lot of these ones like WALKING DEAD where it seems like the human groups are competing to kill each other faster than the zombies can.

A different kind of open carry.

The movie is a a little more clumsy when it comes to the nominal plot throughline, which is about the group’s adversarial relationship with this crazy cult of vampire worshippers who like to go around capturing people and feeding them to the bloodsuckers. I think this is a great concept -- fuckin figures that when you most need people to pull their heads out of their asses and band together to survive, a bunch of them still go in the exact opposite direction (not to generalize, but *cough*Republicans*cough*). Jeez, humanity, this shouldn’t be a controversial issue, but you’re seriously telling me there are people who will actively work to oppose mankind’s survival? It’s so infuriating that you have to admit, yeah, there would definitely be people who do this. So I like the idea, but unfortunately in execution it’s a bit corny and cartoonish, particularly when the head of the cult (Michael Cerveris, mostly known for his theatrical career but with occasional supporting film roles) decides to devote most of his time to hunting this particular tiny group of people. You gotta suspend a little of the ol’ disbelief in the air to accept a vampire apocalypse, but Mickle does a nice job of setting up a world which has its own consistent internal cadence and rules… except when it comes to these cult guys, who feel more like something out of a comic book universe, particularly in the unlikely way they keep running into our buds over and over. The best thing about STAKE LAND is that its universe --even with its silly vampire conceit-- feels grounded and authentic, so its a bit of shame to blow that by inserting some villainous antagonist that the movie doesn’t even need.

sounds legit
It’s not enough to bring the movie down, but it’s enough to keep it from being great, and that’s a shame because there are definitely long stretches here which flirt with real greatness. The actors (including THE INNKEEPERS’ Kelly McGinnis, reinventing herself rather elegantly as a genre staple) do a splendid job of breathing a rough life into their characters (even when they’re not always delivering the most believable dialogue) and Mickle excels at filling out his world with a sense of character and place which few movies --let alone horror movies-- manage as consistently. Several reviews I read compared this movie to John Hillcoat’s THE ROAD, which I consider both a valid comparison and a serious compliment. It’s obvious that Mickle is a real talent to watch, and his last few movies (this and WE ARE WHAT WE ARE) are an interesting look at a serious artist coming into his own, but not quite there yet. STAKE LAND is just a little too rooted in corny genre staples, WE ARE WHAT WE ARE is a little too much of an overcorrection, serving up stately class when maybe just a few more cheap thrills might be necessary. Hopefully his newest ---the crime/thriller COLD IN JULY-- is the happy medium between them, but even if not, I consider a ticket to his next horror movie already sold. Vampires may not be working as hard as they did in the old days, but Mickle sure seems to be.


*Or, worse, they gave up being mythic monsters and just embraced a life of sitting around mooning over relationships and whining about life while listening to trendy indy rock.

**Or, even more horrifying, he’s listening to Death Cab for Cutie with Jim Jarmusch and Kristen Stewart. Come on, Spike Lee, let’s at least avoid that fate with DA SWEET BLOOD OF JESUS.




CHAINSAWNUKAH 2014 CHECKLIST!

The Hunt For Dread October

  • LITERARY ADAPTATION: No
  • SEQUEL: None
  • REMAKE: No
  • FOREIGNER: No
  • FOUND-FOOTAGE CLUSTERFUCK: No
  • SLUMMING A-LISTER: Kelly McGinnis?
  • BELOVED HORROR ICON: Larry Fessenden, Danielle Harris (numerous HALLOWEENs, HATCHETs, but most beloved for her classic take on the "Seagal's niece who gets menaced by baddies" role in MARKED FOR DEATH)
  • BOOBIES: No
  • SEXUAL ASSAULT: Unfortunately yes, but thankfully it's not graphic.
  • DISMEMBERMENT PLAN: Gotta be some beheadings in there, although I gotta admit I don't remember specifically at this late date.
  • HAUNTED HOUSE: No
  • MONSTER: No
  • THE UNDEAD: Vampires
  • POSSESSION: No
  • SLASHER/GIALLO: No
  • PSYCHO KILLERS (Non-slasher variety): No
  • EVIL CULT: Yeah, the Vampire-worshippers
  • (UNCANNY) VALLEY OF THE DOLLS: No
  • TRANSMOGRIFICATION: Man into Vampire
  • OBSCURITY LEVEL: Mid, indie film but well-respected, even got a review in NPR.
  • MORAL OF THE STORY: If your religion involves habitual robe-wearing in a post-apocalyptic wasteland, you just might be an asshole.
  • TITLE ACCURACY: Our grizzled protagonist says "Welcome to Stake Land," but it doesn't really make much sense in context. Still, they say it and there are both stakes and land involved, call it 80%.
  • ALEX MADE IT THROUGH AWAKE: N/A

Wednesday, October 30, 2013

We Are What We Are (2013)



We Are What We Are (2013)
Dir. Jim Mickle
Written by Nick Daminic, Jim Mickle
Starring Bill Sage, Julia Garner, Ambyr Childers, Michael Parks, Wyatt Russell




The two teenage daughters of the Parker family (Julia Garner, Ambyr Childers) have some big problems. Their mom has recently died, their father is grief-stricken, there’s no work in their tiny Appalachian town, access to the outside world is limited by torrential rains, and to top it all off, dear old Dad isn’t going to let a little thing like Mommy’s death prevent the family from celebrating their quaint ancestral ritual the old-fashioned way: cannibalism and bible-reading. Two great tastes that taste great together.


I’m sort of divided about this one (a remake of a 2010 Mexican film of the same name that I haven’t seen). On one hand, this is an unmistakably well-made film. The performances of all the leads are excellent, the film looks gorgeous, the atmosphere is bleak and the score is ominous and evocative. I appreciate how seriously director Jim Mickle (STAKELAND, MULBERRY STREET) takes everything; this is a very serious, deliberately paced horror film which takes a sober and nuanced look at the tension hidden beneath the surface of this outwardly normal family. Despite the lurid subject matter, the horror is mostly psychological, coming from the teenage girl’s repulsion at the “ritual” they are expected to perform and their powerlessness to stop it or oppose their father’s stern will. And dad (Bill Sage) isn’t a one-dimensional villain, either; he genuinely loves his daughters, and fervently believes in the innate rightness of their way of life, even as his mind may be slipping a little from years of indulging his man-eating ways. These are great, complex characters, and they’re written and performed sublimely. Add to that the always great Michael Parks as the local doctor who may just be putting the pieces together, and there’s an abundance of things to admire and enjoy here.

Thanks lord, for providing us with this delicious meal, and on an unrelated note thanks for the ironclad moral code that makes this whole thing work so well.


Unfortunately, as much as I respect the craftsmanship here and the seriousness that Mickle brings to the story, I also wonder if it might have benefitted from a few cheaper thrills. The whole experience is so classy that it feels almost uptight, stodgy. While the tension between the family and the outside world (particularly Wyatt Russell [son of Kurt!] as a young deputy that catches the eye of one of the Parker daughters) works perfectly well, it’s also an extremely low-key kind of tension, and the particular structure of the story doesn’t allow for a slow build approach which gradually ratchets up the suspense, so much as a long, quiet setup with one final burst of action for the climax. The complicated tension within the family works much better, and in fact it’s almost a shame that the whole cannibalism thing is in there competing with what might otherwise be a mannered drama about the shifting dynamics of a family in the wake of a death. But wish it or not, the cannibalism is the ultimate star here, and the problem is that it ends up being the one plot element which has the least real impact. Far too much of the runtime gets burned hinting at things we already pretty much know, and when these thing finally do show up on screen they’re exactly what you imagined, nothing more, nothing less. We already knew it was coming, so when it arrives it’s not especially shocking.

Suspicious Michael Parks is suspicious. 


Cannibalism itself is such a prurient concept that most of the shock is in the basic premise itself; once you’ve imagined it, the worst is over, the movie doesn’t have anything to show you that’s gonna be worse than your own mind can produce. Hence, there aren’t really any standout sequences of particular horror, just the general, simmering unease that the conceit itself evokes. And for my money, that’s just a little too minor to hang an entire 105 minute movie on. I realize I’m a little more jaded than most audiences, but as far as I’m concerned if you want to really shake me you’re going to have to be a little more creative with your premise than just saying, “there is a family of cannibals.” I know, cannibalism is gross. What else ya got? For a horror movie about a family of cannibal serial killers, it’s oddly staid.  

It does have a great ending which finally brings a few unexpected elements and a little bit of much-needed energy. It’s too late by that point to save the thing from being an overall languid experience, but it does muster up enough punch to leave you with a respectable smile on your face. And of course, languid does not equal bad, exactly. The story is always compelling, and it’s helped along by strong character work and a meticulous attention to detail. It’s never boring, it’s just never quite as gripping as it ought to be. Mickle has nothing to be ashamed of in this nuanced, classy, and exceptionally crafted film. But I hope he approaches the next one with a little more bite.




CHAINSAWNUKAH 2013 CHECKLIST!



  • LITERARY ADAPTATION: No
  • SEQUEL: No
  • REMAKE: Yes, of the 2010 Mexican film of the same name.
  • HAMMER STUDIOS: No
  • SPAGHETTI NOCTURNE: No
  • MORE (PETER) CUSHING FOR THE PUSHING? No
  • SLUMMING A-LISTER: None, but you and I both know that Michael Parks is one of the great ones, and that's all that matters.
  • BOOBIES: Yes, although in a decidedly unsexy situation.
  • DECAPITATIONS OR DE-LIMBING: None, most of the chopping is off-screen.
  • ENTRAILS? Same.
  • CULTISTS: This is all done in the name of family religion, I guess it is a cult by definition, but I'm still gonna say it's not really a "cult" movie.
  • ZOMBIES: No
  • VAMPIRES: No
  • SLASHERS: ...serial killers, but not slashers per se.
  • CURSES: No
  • (UNCANNY) VALLEY OF THE DOLLS? No dolls in this one.
  • OBSCURITY LEVEL: Mid, got a limited theatrical release this year.
  • ALEX MADE IT THROUGH AWAKE: N/A
The two daughters talk to each other about their problems.