Tuesday, January 31, 2017

The Dungeonmaster


Dungeonmaster aka Ragewar, aka Ragewar: The Challenge of Excalibrate aka Digital Knights (1984)
Dir. David Allan, Charles Band, John Carl Buechler,  Steven Ford, Peter Manoogian, Ted Nicolaou, and Rosemarie Turko and written by mostly the same and also Jeffrey Byron and Allan Actor
Starring Jeffrey Byron, Richard Moll, Leslie Wing w/ special guests W.A.S.P.




THE DUNGEONMASTER --or RAGEWAR: THE CHALLENGE OF EXCALIBRATE or whatever you want to call it-- is, I guess, a movie. I mean, it’s got a title and credits and actors and stuff anyway. Of course, one of those credits is “produced by Charles Band,” so it was only ever going to bear a passing resemblance to that particular art form. In fact, it more closely resembles a series of loosely connected short films made for no money. For whatever reason.


Allow me to explain: the “plot,” such as it is --which is embarrassing enough that even the movie’s own trailer goes out of its way to obscure it-- finds this dorkus Paul (Jeffrey Byron, “Test Administrator” in STAR TREK 2009) more interested in his superintelligent quasi-sentient 1984 word processor than his nagging girlfriend (Leslie Wing, THE FRIGHTENERS), who correctly worries that he prefers the company of the female-voiced computer to his flesh-and-blood gal. (The computer’s name --no joke, actual adults say this out loud repeatedly-- is X-CaliBR8, which definitely sounds like the World of Warcraft handle of a guy who does a lot of teabagging.)

So it’s exactly like the plot of HER, except for the minor detail that inexplicably and for no apparent reason at all, Paul is whisked away one morning to a fantasy world to battle a wizard (Richard Moll, the bailiff from Night Court) who then outsources the job of battling him to various other scenarios, most of which are easily resolved by pressing buttons on his wrist-mounted X-CaliBR8. The Wizard claims he has spent 1,000 years looking for a “worthy opponent,” and somehow this guy is the best he’s been able to come up with, which is honestly more sad than intimidating. I suspect it’s been a remarkably uneventful 1,000 years. Since Paul doesn’t seem especially bothered by --or even interested in-- this turn of events, Wizard-man also takes the additional precaution of kidnapping his gal-pal, who stands around encouraging Paul to save her and not get distracted. #feminism. Incidentally, the Wizard also decides that Paul should be dressed in a costume somewhere between RAW-era Eddie Murphy and a video game ninja, marking the first moment where the movie and I are in complete agreement.




Each scenario plays like a short film, which makes sense because that’s exactly what they are, self-contained little vignettes from different directors which place Paul in some kind of danger that he resolves by shooting computer lasers. Like any anthology, some are better than others, but all were produced by Charles Band so, (also like most anthologies), even the best ones still aren’t very good. I’m a little iffy on the order; the only other review I can find which lists each segment individually starts off with the “Stone Canyon Giant” segment directed by David Allen (visual effects on numerous films including GHOSTBUSTERS II, director of this, another short film and PUPPETMASTER II), but I’m 90% certain the version I saw begins with Rosemarie Turko’s (SCARRED, nothing else) segment “Ice Gallery.” Since there’s no way in hell I’m going back to check, let’s do this from memory:


Prologue: (director unclear, but I think Charles Band) A very 80’s lady strips naked and Paul gets ready to bone her, but suddenly monsters in very cheap masks come in and ruin things. This is a dream and has no direct literal connection to anything that follows, and was almost certainly added as an afterthought once someone watched the finished film and realized there were no tits in it. Anyway, Paul awakens from this dream, and after a brief and confusing introduction to the characters and the villain, we move on to the challenges of the Dungeonmaster (there are no dungeons in the movie and nobody is ever addressed as “master,” so I can only assume it’s Paul’s last name).


1: Ice Gallery (directed by Rosemarie Turko) finds our hero hurled through time and space into this cave where there are a lot of frozen statues of colorful people and an absolutely unholy amount of dry ice. Paul observes that “every criminal in the world is here,” which is odd because the most notable denizens are Albert Einstein, a non-specific Samurai, and a werewolf. Or, as the trailer narrator puts it, “the ordeal! Of the Ice Monsters of DOOM!”  Needless to say, the ice melts and a few of the characters (but not all) thaw out and attack. Fortunately he has that X-CaliBR8 armband, and that takes care of things. This segment is cheap and shitty.




2: Demons of the Dead (dir. by John Carl Buechler, of CELLAR DWELLER and FRIDAY THE 13th Part VII: THE NEW BLOOD fame) transports Paul to a different, non-ice cave set almost certainly built for some other movie, where a couple of pretty good-looking zombie warriors halfheartedly lurch towards him, only to be quickly overwhelmed by his cheesy laser effects. Then he is confronted by a corny-looking but agreeably goofy muppet named “Ratspit” who bills himself as the “caretaker of the dead” (as we learned from BOOK OF BLOOD, the dead have a surprisingly robust economy). Fortunately he has that X-CaliBR8 armband, and that takes care of things. This segment is cheap and shitty.




3: Heavy Metal (dir. by Charles Band, DOLLMAN VS DEMONIC TOYS, GINGERDEAD MAN VS EVIL BONG) makes time for, why not, a cameo from 80’s hair-metal also-rans W.A.S.P., who in the DUNGEONMASTER universe --unlike in real life-- are a) cool enough for us to be excited to see them in a cameo and b) the demonic minions of a reality-hopping wizard with a chip on his shoulder and a complete inability to defend himself against a smug talking computer that shoots lasers. W.A.S.P. and their fanatical female fans menace Paul for a minute or two with their laser-shooting guitar (Paul doesn’t seem to see the irony of having this technology turned against him) while their tune “Tormentor” plays from somewhere. Having barely defeated a sedentary muppet, a band named after dull white suburban drones still represents a new low, but that’s Paul for you; it seems there is literally no situation he can’t find danger in, up to and including the dance floor of a hair-metal band. Fortunately he has that X-CaliBR8 armband, and that takes care of things. Having survived W.A.S.P. stealing his laser gimmick, he decides to ironically murder them with the power of music by setting the computer to “disintegrate by high-frequency sound,” which seems to do the trick (the drummer --who I assume to be Tony Richards, W.A.S.P. drummer ‘82-’84 -- actually blows up behind the kit, in a moment of bizarre parallel evolution with THIS IS SPINAL TAP). This segment is cheap and shitty.



4: “Stone Canyon Giant” (dir. David Allen, visual effects on WILLOW) changes up the formula a little bit by sending Paul outside, where two little people (Phil Fondacaro [HARD ROCK ZOMBIES], and his brother Sal) steal his X-CaliBR8, leaving him utterly, utterly helpless. Things then get worse when a hundred-foot-tall stop-motion giant statue takes exception his his presence and lumbers after him. Fortunately he quickly recovers the X-CaliBR8 and that’s that. This segment is cheap and stupid, but I cannot in good conscience call anything with a pissed-off stop-motion giant shitty. I’d like to, I truly would, but it’s just not in me to do it. “Stone Canyon Giant” gets a pass, particularly since it’s mercifully short and to-the-point.




5: Slasher (dir Seven Ford, no other directorial credits but lots of small roles as an actor. Also, this is weird, but he’s the son of former President Gerald R. Ford) starts out OK. And then the movie takes a real significant dive in quality, which is really saying something since it wasn’t exactly hot shit to begin with, except maybe in the literal sense. I feel kind of bad saying that, since this is clearly the only segment anyone seems to have put any real effort into, but sadly that just results in a vignette which is still lurching in the gutter but also doesn’t really capture the corny charm which helps the rest of this turkey go down a little smoother. “Slasher” appears to be someone’s attempt at a really, really tame giallo-type slasher scenario combined with the world’s most idiotic detective story. And it really stands out from the other sections for a few reasons; first, it’s set in contemporary America instead of a weird fantasy world, and second, it utilizes a very slightly more complex narrative structure than “Paul transports into some kind of cave, and there is some kind of monster which he shoots with a laser.” Instead, Paul awakens in an alley next to a dead body, a turn of events which is no doubt all too familiar to this movie’s producers. The cops show up almost immediately and arrest him, leaving the corpse to rot in the streets, as is standard police procedure. After a few minutes in the back of the police cruiser, Paul remembers that he has that computer on his arm, which he quickly uses to James-Bond himself out of the police car and onto the street, where he can use his keen detective skills to find the real killer without having to change out of his blue ninja vest. But this time, it’s not Paul himself in danger; the killer, we learn courtesy of a perfunctory expository visit by the wizard, has selected Paul’s girlfriend as his next victim!


Now, Paul’s gal has occasionally appeared in these little challenges before, usually as an incidental damsel-in-distress (she’s been tied up by W.A.S.P., for example) but also sometimes in the sidekick role (for some reason both she and Paul are required to solve the riddle of the ice cave, probably because he’s woefully incapable of tackling any problem which cannot be solved solely via laser fire.) Here, though, she’s niether -- she’s just a denizen of the real world, and has no memory of Paul or anything about wizards, nor does she know she’s being stalked by a killer. But wait, this isn’t some kind of fantasy world, this is real, contemporary America -- you know, the place where she lives in real life. But this is not her real life, so… what gives? I honestly don’t know if this is some sort of crazy virtual reality, or it’s another dimension, or it really IS reality and she’s just had her memory wiped and an elaborate fictional backstory constructed, or what, but I think we can all agree it makes no sense. I’d pity poor actor Jeffrey Byron for having to muddle through this hopeless scenario, except that in this case he’s also the writer, and as such responsible for his own mess. I’m as bleeding heart as they come, but come on, personal responsibility, fellah. Anyway, after an intolerably long time farting around trying to pretend we could possibly experience any tension over any of this in the same movie which offers a muppet named “Ratspit,” Paul manages to find the… alternate dimension version of his girlfriend (?) just as she’s about to meet her doom. Fortunately he has that X-CaliBR8 armband, and that takes care of things. This segment is cheap and shitty, and also direly boring.

There's no good images from this one, so instead enjoy a little visit from our old friend, animated 80's lightning.


6: Cave Beast (dir. Peter Manoogian, DEMONIC TOYS, ARENA) finds Paul back in familiar territory, yet another styrofoam cave with a monster in dire need of being defeated by laser fire. By this point Paul, like the audience, is fatigued with this concept to the point that he can barely motivate himself to enter the subterranean vault, but he goes through with it, and engages in a short rock-throwing match with a critter of some type. Fortunately he has that X-CaliBR8 armband, and that takes care of things. Unfortunately, in this case winning is losing, because the defeated critter turns into an angel and admonishes him for defending himself. “You would have won if you had simply not walked into the cave,” she lectures, nonsensically. Not to blame the victim, but if she didn’t want death by laser beam, she shouldn’t have been dressed like an aggressive cave critter. Anyway, Paul seems uncharacteristically broken up over the whole thing, but for some reason “losing” this challenge  --if that is indeed what happened-- doesn’t seem to make any difference, and it’s on to the final round. This segment is cheap and shitty.


7: Desert Pursuant (dir. Ted Nicolau, TERRORVISION, SUBSPECIES, in his first directorial effort*): This segment wisely ditches the SWORD AND THE SORCERER (with lasers) ripoff and adopts a much more venerable ripoff structure for no-budget z-movies: The MAD MAX ripoff. Paul, this time accompanied by his gal, turns up in a junkyard populated by Sand People (I believe the preferred term is Tusken Raiders) driving what Australians would refer to as “compact cars” and everyone else on Earth would describe as “Libertine deathmobiles.” One of the riders grabs his X-CaliBR8 (marking the second time today he’s lost it like a chump) but he uses math to tell the laser to kill the thief, proving that the man is capable of making even shooting laser beams at futuristic marauders into something embarrassingly nerdy. Going on the offensive, Paul and his trusty co-pilot steal one of the death mobiles and go on a rampage of laser-fueled high-octane carnage like a Blackwater merc on his fifth consecutive day of nothing but vodka and PCP. This culminates in a suicide game of chicken, where Paul, having dispatched his other opponents with lasers, decides to try something different and drive his car head-on into his final foe at full speed, killing him instantly and resulting in a huge fireball. Seriously, that actually happens. Not only does it happen, but apparently it was the way to “win” this challenge, which is, if anything, even more confusing than the “this time, you win by NOT shooting the monster” fake-out from last time. You win by killing yourself? Man, this video game is pretty easy. Anyway, for once the computer lasers play only a huge, huge role in winning here, instead of being the only factor. So that makes it kind of refreshing. And while this is certainly cheap, it’s rambunctious enough not to be completely shitty, because, let’s face it, are we really capable of turning up our noses at weirdos in masks driving crudely assembled deathmobiles at unsafe speeds? I, for one, am not. “Desert Pursuant” wins the “least shitty” award of the seven challenges, for its commitment to whammy and its excellent use of the word “pursuant.”




So, after seven dull and pointless challenges, it’s back to the netherworld, where Paul and his wizard buddy have to face off in a final fight to the death, which takes the form of a short, awkward wrestling match. The wizard, goaded by Paul, promises to refrain from using magic to win, but then breaks his promise, but somehow that drops him into a lake of lava, so, yay for the win I guess? Not be be outdone, Paul manages to find one more use for his X-CaliBR8, as it saves him from plunging to a similar fate (by shooting a laser he can grab? Anyone want to explains the physics on that one?). A poof of dry ice later, and Paul, girlfriend, and computer are all safely back at home. And what do they talk about? Why, marriage, of course! Seems that while Paul was battling an interdimensional wizard, girlfriend talked it over with the computer and decided to take the plunge. Possibly because she just got to experience exactly how completely helpless Paul finds himself without the aide of the magic adding machine, possibly because she’s just using him to get close to that sexy, sexy muthaboard. But anyway, it makes about as much sense as anything else here.

"I dunno, I can't seem to shake the feeling that someday these "computers" will make Donald Trump President."

DUNGEONMASTER is, of course, a total piece of shit. But you knew that. You’d guess that even if you didn’t know they’d changed the name to “Dungeonmaster” --from the somehow even less appealing original title RAGEWAR-- in the hopes of coasting on the good name of Dungeons and Dragons. And it’s a sad, sad day when you need to falsely impersonate D&D to become more popular. It’s probably for the best, though; a movie called RAGEWAR could, in theory, be good. It might even be a good name for a black metal band. Fortunately, a movie called DUNGEONMASTER could never, ever be good, so I doubt anyone watching this one was shocked by its incredibly low quality, idiotic dialogue (the phrase “I reject your reality and substitute my own,” --made famous by Mythbusters’ Adam Savage-- originates in this film and is spoken in complete seriousness) and hilarious repetitive low-effort hokum. At least the segments are all pretty quick (several are under five minutes!) and the movie itself is a paltry 73 minutes, meaning that (with the exception of the distended “Slasher” segment) if you’re not into one vignette, the next one is always right around the corner. Of course, none of the them are really any good at all, and nearly half involve shooting lasers at monsters in cheap cave sets, so moving quickly to the next bit is not exactly a foolproof method of maintaining your attention.


That having been said... As spectacularly idiotic no-budget howlers go, DUNGEONMASTER is something pretty special. Very, very few films this dorky are so completely unaware of that fact. I’m completely convinced that the makers of DUNGEONMASTER were totally sure they were tapping right into a rich vein of cool, leaving the movie absolutely dripping with camp potential. With a bunch of friends and a respectably heroic about of alcohol, it could be a real hoot. But you’ll really have to supply your own entertainment; even the usual “oh well, at least there were tits and some gore in there” ethos doesn’t apply here, because aside from the tacked-on opening there is zero nudity or gore, and I don’t think even any foul language. Aside from a nifty stop-motion giant and a few respectably decked-out go-carts, this is a strictly “laugh-at, not-with” affair. Your commentary is almost guaranteed to be more entertaining than the actual movie, which isn’t typically the way I prefer these things. But if shooting fish in a barrel with a bunch of buds is your bag, this is a very small barrel overstocked with some very lazy fish indeed.


*He also edited TOURIST TRAP and served as “Additional editor” on ROAR.

Also this happens at some point. I honestly cannot remember the context.
CHAINSAWNUKAH 2016 CHECKLIST!
Good Kill Hunting


ALIAS
Ragewar!
TAGLINE
He is the Overlord Of Strange Beasts And Stolen Souls. Which I guess means the “Dungeonmaster” is actually the wizard, not Paul. In that case, I guess it seems semi-true.
TITLE ACCURACY
No dungeon, no master, no accuracy. Then again, “Ragewar” is almost entirely meaningless, and RAGEWAR: THE CHALLENGE OF EXCALIBRATE is impossible for a human being to say without suicidal thoughts, and misspells “X-CaliBR8” in any case.
LITERARY ADAPTATION?
Absolutely not.
SEQUEL?
Believe it or not, there actually is sort of a sequel. The 1988 anthology PULSE POUNDERS is said to include a 30-minute segment in which both Byron and Moll reprise their roles. I use the word “said” because apparently the film has only ever screened once; it was shelved when Empire Pictures collapsed in 1989, and only rediscovered in 2011, to be exhibited at a Chicago film festival the following year. The wikipedia page claims it will be released “via a streaming service,” someday, but as near as I can tell that has never happened.
REMAKE?
No
COUNTRY OF ORIGIN
USA
HORROR SUB-GENRE
Anthology, Zombie, Wizard, Sci-Fi, Stop-motion, Slasher, Post-Apocalyptic,
SLUMMING A-LISTER?
W.A.S.P? Richard Moll?
BELOVED HORROR ICON?
Charles Band? John Buechler? Ted Nicolaou?
NUDITY?
Yes, a weird full frontal dream sequence pre-credits, and then nothing else ever again
SEXUAL ASSAULT?
Methias or whatever gropes up our boy’s lady pretty good while she’s chained up, but over her clothes.
WHEN ANIMALS ATTACK!
Wolfman?
GHOST/ ZOMBIE / HAUNTED BUILDING?
Some talk of the “land of the dead” and presumably some corpses, though they not too specific about exactly what label they fall under.
POSSESSION?
No,
CREEPY DOLLS?
None
EVIL CULT?
Magic aplenty, but no specific cult
MADNESS?
There’s a slasher in there I guess.
TRANSMOGRIFICATION?
Statue comes to life, eventually. Oh, and some kind of cave troll turns into a winged lady.
VOYEURISM?
Surprisingly little of note, which is weird for a movie like this, you’d think they’d go sleazier.
MORAL OF THE STORY
In 1984, there was no magical problem which a computer could not solve using lasers.


Thursday, January 19, 2017

Lady Frankenstein


Lady Frankenstein (1971)
Dir. Mel Welles
Story by Dick Randall, Written by Edward Di Lorenzo (wikipedia lists about a dozen other writers, but those are the only two on-screen credits)
Starring Joseph Cotten, Rosalba Neri (as Sara Bay), Paul Muller, Peter Whiteman




“Sure, Rosalba Neri (aka "Sara Bay") is no Peter Cushing, but there's no doubt which one of them I'd rather see naked.” -- IMDB commentator “Lazarillo” (or is it “Iazarillo with an “i”?” hard to tell.) 11/30/04


So, what LADY FRANKENSTEIN offers is a radical reimagining of the Frankenstein story, where Frankenstein is a lady. Or, to be more specific, where Frankenstein is a man but then he dies at the end of the first act and he has a daughter who is a lady. A Lady Frankenstein, if you will. The movie at least has enough class to assume that you understand that “Frankenstein” refers to the scientist, not the monster. The monster is not a lady, he is a regular Frankenstein’s monster. That is the most class the movie will be able to muster, so enjoy it while you can.


The weird thing about LADY FRANKENSTEIN is for a while, it’s pretty much just REGULAR FRANKENSTEIN. Joseph Cotten --who starred in CITIZEN KANE, SHADOW OF A DOUBT, and THE THIRD MAN before he must have done something to really piss off his agent-- appears as Baron Dr. Victor Frankenstein, MD, who has a dream to resurrect the dead by transplanting the brain of a freshly deceased convict into a monstrous body he’s whipped up from scratch. When his sidekick Dr. Marshall (Paul Muller, NIGHTMARE CASTLE) points out that the brain they’re planning on swapping has been damaged, Frankenstein irritatedly tells him that sometimes science is more art than science and goes ahead anyway. Or, as he puts it: “Instinct changes the world, not thought! And my instinct tells me to transplant that brain right now!” To the surprise of no one except this brilliant scientist, instinct does not turn out to be the best means of determining when to transplant brains, and pretty soon the monster has killed him and is running amok.




Fortunately, Frankenstein has a daughter named Tania (Rosalba Neri --going by “Sara Bay” here-- probably most known for this movie, but with perhaps the best track record for films with great titles that I have ever seen on IMBD*) who is just home from college. She wants to get involved in the family business, but Frankenstein is having none of it, until his untimely demise. Fortunately, Dr. Marshall really, really wants to bone her (understandable) and reluctantly gets on board with her plan to take her father’s place. Weirdly, considering the whole point here is to resurrect the dead, there is very little if any discussion of reviving daddy Frankenstein; instead, the new plan is to A) deny responsibility for the monster who is running around the countryside encountering various Italians having sex in the middle of the road in broad daylight and murdering them, and B) transfer Dr. Marshall’s brain out of the unfuckable body of a nebbish scientist and into the comparably more fuckable body currently occupied by “mildly retarded servant” (not my term; that's from the official plot synopsis) Thomas (Marino Masé, who has worked with both Goddard and Coppola. No, seriously!).


Not much happens to further either of these goals for a long time, and the movie contents itself with some unbearable filler about a detective and the Frankenstein family’s merry band of grave-robbers, which is distinguished only by the startlingly over-the-top anti-semitic Jewish caricature of a grave-robber (Herbert Fux, “Austrian actor and politician”** JESUS FRANCO’S JACK THE RIPPER), which is about as over-the-line as I’ve seen in a modern film (note the gigantic menorah in his house). But blatant anti-semitism can only entertain us for short periods, so we also have to occasionally flash back to the monster, still running around and killing naked Italians. This tends to be what Frankenstein movies think we’re paying for, but it’s usually a pretty dull affair, without much notable gore or memorable gimmickry. And besides, we didn’t pay for a Frankenstein movie. We paid for a Lady Frankenstein movie. So the more interesting storyline has to do with the plan to get Dr. Marshall a younger, hotter bod. The murder part turns out to be pretty easy; Madam Frankenstein lures the young man into the house with the promise of sex, and then has Marshall smother him while they’re right in the middle of things. I say “the middle,” because, heroically, she doesn’t let her partner’s demise spoil her fun. They should put a frame from this scene on one of those motivational posters above the word “persistence.” Unfortunately the brain transferring part goes a little less smoothly, as they are interrupted by the return of the prodigal monster, with a very pissed off mob of ignorant villagers hot on his tail.




None of this really adds up to much, but I do have to give the movie credit for doing something a little different. It’s an odd mix of Hammer-style gothic horror (a looming castle, period costumes, an impressive mad science lab) with imaginative sleaze that could only come from Italy (necrophiliac coitus, random open-air daytime sex), but directed by an American actor (Mel Welles, LITTLE SHOP OF HORRORS 1960) right as the scales were beginning to tip away from Gothic Horror towards the giallo and eventually the slasher. So it’s kinda a hybrid, stitched together from different traditions into an unwieldy whole. A Frankenstein’s monster, if you will. And draped over that odd structure is a bizarre and confused story of female empowerment and sexual liberation which the movie is both repulsed and fascinated by. Lady Frankenstein is a villain, and not much of a character even at that, but it’s worth noting that she’s very much the protagonist, a vastly more active and complex character than virtually any Hammer female role that comes to mind. The movie is cheap and incompetent (the opening credits have a fucking typo, for god’s sake), but as an especially offbeat iteration of the Frankenstein story, and especially as an artifact from a very particular cross-section in both horror cinema and the sexual revolution, it’s worth a peek. Also the monster has a popped-out eye dangling there, which wins it another half-star all by itself.




*Lo strano ricatto di una ragazza per bene (The Strange Blackmail of A Good Girl), THE SEXBURY TALES, AND THEY SMELLED THE STRANGE, EXCITING, DANGEROUS SCENT OF DOLLARS, IN THE WEST THERE WAS A MAN NAMED INVINCIBLE, THE FRENCH SEX MURDERS, WATCH OUT GRINGO! SABATA WILL RETURN, PASSWORD: KILL AGENT GORDON, HERCULES AGAINST THE SONS OF THE SUN, SECRET CONFESSIONS OF A CLOISTERED CONVENT


**If the thought of an Austrian actor playing a greedy, amoral Jewish desecrator of Christian graves fills you with some degree of concern, at least be comforted to know as a politician he “was among the founders of a citizens' initiative against commercialization and uglification of Salzburg's historic townscape and became an elected member of the city council. In 1982 he and others established the Austrian United Greens party (Vereinte Grüne Österreichs, VGÖ), which in 1986 merged into the Green Alternative (Grüne Alternative). Fux was elected MP of the Austrian National Council in the 1986 legislative election, he retained his seat until December 1988 and again entered into parliament in November 1989. In November 1990 he retired and later served as culture committee chairman in his hometown Salzburg.” according to wikipedia. So seems like a pretty good guy.***


***Also, Fux must be the only actor to work with both Ingmar Bergman and Jesus Franco in the same year (he has what must be an extremely minor role in THE SERPENT’S EGG, and co-stars as “Satan” in Franco’s LOVE LETTERS FROM A PORTUGUESE NUN). That’s some fuckin’ range as an actor. He followed it up the next year with another strange pairing, appearing in movies by Meneham Golan (THE URANIUM CONSPIRACY) and Werner Herzog (WOYZECK)

Because sometimes quotation marks and commas are the same thing.

CHAINSAWNUKAH 2016 CHECKLIST!
Good Kill Hunting


TAGLINE
Only The Monster She Made Could Satisfy Her Strange Desires! Which is actually more accurate to the plot than you’d usually expect from these things, and A Mad Surgeon's Mind in a Woman's Body which, while technically true, is both sexist and misleading, because it suggests the mind didn’t start out there.
TITLE ACCURACY
100%
LITERARY ADAPTATION?
Very, very, very loose adaptation of Frankenstein: Or, The Modern Prometheus by Mary Shelley
SEQUEL?
None
REMAKE?
No
COUNTRY OF ORIGIN
Italy
HORROR SUB-GENRE
Science (mad), Monster, Frankenstein
SLUMMING A-LISTER?
Joseph Cotten
BELOVED HORROR ICON?
None.
NUDITY?
Yes, the area seems to be mainly populated by nude women and topless men engaged in the throes of passion.
SEXUAL ASSAULT?
Yes, in the sense that multiple people are assaulted while having sex
WHEN ANIMALS ATTACK!
No
GHOST/ ZOMBIE / HAUNTED BUILDING?
Zombie / reanimated corpse
POSSESSION?
No
CREEPY DOLLS?
None
EVIL CULT?
No
MADNESS?
Arguably
TRANSMOGRIFICATION?
Eventually some brains get swapped, etc
VOYEURISM?
Yes, Lady F and Timmy or whatever go at it while Charles watches.
MORAL OF THE STORY
Women can be just as good at science as men, but they’d just use that knowledge to put the brains of smart men into the bodies of handsome men.

And not a very strong C- at that. But at least weird enough to escape a two-thumb rating.