As
Above So Below (2014)
Dir John Erick Dowdle
Written
by John
Erick Dowdle, Drew Dowdle
Starring
Perdita
Weeks, Ben Feldman, Edwin Hodge, François Civil, Marion Lambert, Ali Marhyar
Well, it’s Chainsawnukah, so
tradition dictates that you gotta get some found-footage shit in there. For
years this was merely a matter of statistical probability; if two out of every
three new horror movies was found footage, you just had to accept that you'd end up with at least one by sheer chance,
even if you were actively trying to avoid it. This year, though, I notice that
they’re not nearly as pervasive; a new trend of mopey, uneventful indie “horror”
movies about sad people seems to have emerged as the fashionable way for lazy hucksters
to crank out content with minimal effort. But a tradition is a tradition, so a-hunting
for found-footage clusterfucks of yesteryear I went. This fit the bill nicely
in that it was A) found footage and B) that’s it. I did not have high hopes for
AS ABOVE, SO BELOW, even going in with the interesting trivia that it was
actually shot in the real Catacombs of Paris. Great, what better way to
experience a jaw-dropping real-world marvel than through an indecipherable
visual jumble of shaky cam with ad-libbed shouting over top? But I watched it
anyway, because that’s the kind of guy I am.
And it turned out that was a good
idea, because right off the bat, it's way nuttier than I anticipated.
We begin with the introduction of our hero, the excellently-named Scarlett
Marlowe (Perdita Weeks, minor roles in both HAMLET and SPICE WORLD! Now that’s
a resume!) who we encounter in medias res, already on an adventure considerably more epic than you would usually
find in some found-footage debacle: she’s tomb-raiding a forgotten, sinister
underground shrine in Iran as part of her quest to discover the secret of famed
14th-century alchemist Nicolas Flamel. And what she discovers in
Iran (after effecting an exciting escape while the cavern collapses behind
her!) sends her to Paris, to uncover a secret message transcribed on the back
of Flamel’s tombstone! Woah, was not expecting this crazy ass Da Vinci Code
shit.
In Paris, she meets up with her dishwater-dull ex-boyfriend,
George (Ben Feldman, one of the guys who gets killed in opening 15-minute
mini-movie in the FRIDAY THE 13th REMAKE) and cameraman Benji (Edwin
Hodge, two PURGEs), and then get right down to the business of finding the treasure
map hidden on the back of Nicolas Flamel’s tombstone or whatever. You might
think this in itself would require, like, a heist or something, but nope; the tombstone is just hanging there in a museum, not guarded or even behind glass or
anything. I thought this whole thing was delightfully silly until I looked it
up and discovered that no, this is actually a real place (the Musée de Cluny, a
Paris museum devoted to the Middle Ages), and that’s probably Flamel’s real tombstone being used as a prop. Take this movie out of the “horror” section,
folks, it’s a documentary! Needless to say, they waste no time in translating the
Aramaic writing of a 14th-century Frenchman’s tombstone poem, and holy shit, it rhymes in English! That’s thinkin’ ahead, Nicolas Flamel, you
old dog! He also apparently calculated his conspiracy numbers in feet, which
seems surprising. But I guess I can't argue with them, since they're looking at the real tombstone of a legendary magical weirdo.
This turns out to be the movie’s secret weapon. Something
about the mix of fantastical bullshit with actual reality that’s even crazier
really does it for me. I guess it’s why I’m so embarrassingly helpless to
resist the appeal of Ancient Aliens or a good conspiracy theory or
whatever. Reality is nearly always going to be weirder and more interesting
than whatever bullshit some goofball found-footage director is going to be able
to imagine, and so the smartest thing a fiction writer can do, sometimes, is
find some little nugget of real-world insanity and piggyback on top of that,
drawing tenuous but irresistible links between the stranger corners of actual
reality rather than inventing new, and almost certainly less outlandish,
fiction from whole cloth. The good create; the best steal. I’m sorry, but it’s
fucking awesome that Nicolas Flamel really did design his own mysterious,
cryptic tombstone, and that you can actually go to some museum in Paris and see
it! Throw some circuitous plot and outlandish theory over top of that, and I’m
a happy man.
Here’s the problem, though: I’m way into this dumbass story, but
the found footage makes it 1,000 times harder to buy, because all I can think
is how unnatural and phony all the acting and photography and everything about
this is. I can and will happily accept that there’s a 600-year old alchemical
conspiracy to solve, but I cannot accept that human beings talk or act like
this, and the found-footage conceit forces me to compare this behavior to
mundane reality in a way that traditional cinematic staging doesn’t. If you’re going to start throwing around the
name “Nicolas Flamel” why on Earth would you ever intentionally do anything to
remind the audience of what normal reality is like?
Still, as luck would have it, the tombstone sends our Da Vinci Treasure-hunters
down into the endless, ancient catacombs below Paris, and of course, they
actually shot there for real! Apparently this is the first film production ever
to do so! And once there, the obvious objective reality of the catacombs themselves
takes you a long way. Plus, our party is joined by irreverent, punk rock Parisians
Papillion (François Civil, FRANK), Souxie (Marion Lambert, MONGEVILLE) and Zed
(Ali Marhyar, ZERO DARK THIRTY), who agree to guide them through the dangerous
maze, and have an easy, practical naturalism to them that the Americans do not.
In fact, I wondered if they too were “real” – actual catacomb guides essentially
playing themselves on screen. Doesn’t seem like it, but at least they inhabit
their roles much more naturally than the Americans do, and contribute a real
lived-in feel which grounds the film immensely. Papillion’s straightforward,
pragmatic guide to how to crawl across ancient human bones without hurting your
arms smacks of lived experience, and the actor delivers it with the right mix
of very sensible advice and very slight smugness about his greater experience.
He seems confident and reasonable and in control, in a very grounded way.
That makes it all the more potent when he suddenly doesn’t seem to
be in control any more, when the skills he’s mastered betray him. Because
wouldn’t you know it, before long our heroes end up hopelessly lost, and begin
to suspect that something supernatural and sinister may be going down. Here,
again, I appreciate François Civil's convincing mix of bafflement and panic. He
should be in complete control down here –this is what he’s spent his life mastering—and
yet reality refuses to cooperate. This is so fundamentally unbalancing that he
doesn’t even think to conceal his shock and panic, which consequently makes it
so internal that it doesn’t read to his companions as quite as devastating and
potentially dangerous as it is. That kind of upending of reality is a much richer
source of horror than simple fear of the unknown, and helps build an escalating unease which is surprisingly effective. Sadly, the French cast gradually
gets lost in the shuffle, supplanted by Feldman and Weeks, neither of whom has
even the vaguest echo of human authenticity to them. Feldman, in particular, is
a total non-entity, which is especially disappointing since apparently the
actor suffered from claustrophobia and must have been disturbed beyond words by
the work he was doing. It doesn’t end up on the screen, though. There's a time and place for method acting, but the only important thing is what the audience actually sees. Sometimes it's better to just follow Peter Lorre's advice and 'just makes faces.' Whatever Feldman is feeling,
he’s not making the appropriate face.
The found-footage approach is never believable, and almost always ugly and
unnecessary, but it does get at the essential point here: this is an experiential
movie. Found-footage is a
miserable medium, generally speaking, for telling a story, because of its
constricting focus on specific visual perspectives. But it’s a much better medium for documenting an experience, one long incident which doesn’t call for
narrative finesse so much as focused intensity. At its best, the conceit traps the viewer within some kind of ordeal, refusing to grant them the omniscient safety of unmotivated editing and forcing a grueling, intimate sense of being in the thick of it. The camerawork here doesn’t do
that more than thoughtful standard photography could, and in many ways it highlights the phoniness of the whole scenario and potentially lessens the impact. But it does generally get the job done sufficiently, if not optimally. It’s at
least the sort of found-footage movie which understands that it’s shooting for
immediacy, not realism. It doesn’t capture the strange, alien feeling of being
underground better than the immensely shitty TEMPLE, though, and that ain't a high bar to clear. But it does have better ideas: it establishes a baseline of
reality strong enough that small disruptions in that reality, be they phony
acting or deliberate continuity breaks, have real impact. And of all the real
things, there is nothing more real than the stomach-churning power of those
catacombs.
The catacombs themselves are, of course, the real star –as well
they should be. The feeling of all those years and all that weight above as we descend lower and lower into a claustrophobic netherworld has some genuine, undeniable power, at least to someone with my particular
constellation of weaknesses (claustrophobia, antiquarianism, and Catholicism). And
the idea of being trapped, forced down, down, beyond the point of no return,
beyond the point where anything makes sense, perhaps into Hell itself, evokes something one encounters only very rare in a horror movie: actual horror. Philosophical
horror, horror that troubles the very waters of the soul. If the movie had trusted
this instinct, it might have strayed dangerously close to genuinely great
territory, and damn the ugly and unnecessary shaky-cam.
Unfortunately, the movie’s actual idea of horror pales in comparison to the basic factual horror of its premise, and so much of the end is concerned with scary
silent people sitting in chairs facing away from you, monsters that suddenly
pop out from behind walls, and various assorted haunted house detritus. Even if
the movie’s very end is suitable mind-bending, the 20 minutes of wasted
goodwill leading up to it drain much of its impact.
Still, it lingered in my mind. There's something visceral and potent here, and no amount of phony acting or tired jump scares can quite dissipate the oppressive, amorphous feel of gut-deep horror that comes with the endless, maddening descent into that alien subterranean hell where the living hold no power. They can weaken that feeling, but a few days later any irritation has passed, and the troubled dreams remain. It's a feeling bigger and more powerful than AS ABOVE SO BELOW is capable of handling or channeling effectively, but at least for a little while, it at least manages to unambiguously conjure it. I wish it were great, and I think
greatness was, at least at some point in the conceptual stage, within its
reach. But I’ll settle for good, and it is intermittently pretty good.
Also want to point out that it introduced me to the French
punk/psychaedellic band La Femme, and I think this is love.
CHAINSAWNUKAH 2019 CHECKLIST!
For
Richer or Horror
TAGLINE
|
The Only Way Out Is Down.
|
TITLE ACCURACY
|
Pretty good, since it’s a phrase which literally
suggests that our crew is going underground, and also has both religious and
mystic connotations.
|
LITERARY ADAPTATION?
|
No
|
SEQUEL?
|
None
|
REMAKE?
|
None.
|
COUNTRY OF ORIGIN
|
USA, though shot on-location in Paris, France
|
HORROR SUB-GENRE
|
Found-footage, haunted house, Religious horror,
|
SLUMMING A-LISTER?
|
None
|
BELOVED HORROR ICON?
|
None
|
NUDITY?
|
No
|
SEXUAL ASSAULT?
|
No
|
WHEN ANIMALS ATTACK!
|
None
|
GHOST/ ZOMBIE / HAUNTED BUILDING?
|
Yes, ghosts
|
POSSESSION?
|
Yes
|
CREEPY DOLLS?
|
No. But there is a creepy piano!
|
EVIL CULT?
|
Yes, though we never learn much about it
|
MADNESS?
|
Certainly
|
TRANSMOGRIFICATION?
|
No
|
VOYEURISM?
|
None beyond the basic found-footage conceit.
|
MORAL OF THE STORY
|
Da Vinci Coding is more common than you might think, yet
another possible career option I unwisely never considered.
|
Admittedly a weak 4-thumb effort, but it definitely managed to get to me at times, just enough to push it into distinctly positive territory. |
No comments:
Post a Comment